Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1483493

Re: [PATCH] fs/dcache: resched/chill only if we make no progress

From Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] fs/dcache: resched/chill only if we make no progress
Date 2016-09-14 19:20 +0200
Message-ID <shm0N-3Fk-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sfcfg-S4-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfJNU-50v-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2016-09-10 08:17:13 [+0200], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > +		if (parent == dentry) {
> > +			/* the task with the highest priority won't schedule */
> > +			r = cond_resched();
> > +			if (!r && (rt_task(current) || dl_task(current)))
> 
> That's wrong because a non RT task will just spin until its time slice is
> up. Wasted cycles for nothing.
> 
> Ideally we make spinning conditional on 
> 
>     !on_cpu(dentry->lock->owner)
> 
> That would avoid going to sleep if the owner runs on another cpu. We have
> no mechanism for that, but I think it'd be worth to think about one.

something like

|#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|                             task_running(task_rq(lock_owner), lock_owner))
|#else
|                             1)
|#endif
|                                 cpu_chill();

the lock_owner is tricky because we have two locks: inode->i_lock and
parent->d_lock. So we would have to do the same lookup, like
dentry_kill() is doing, and check both in worth case.

Sebastian

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] fs/dcache: resched/chill only if we make no progress Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-10 08:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] fs/dcache: resched/chill only if we make no progress Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-14 19:20 +0200

csiph-web