Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1484905
| From | Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] UBI: simplify recover_peb() code |
| Date | 2016-09-16 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <shZvg-40T-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <se3H3-5qz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <se3H3-5qz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <shYpr-3nl-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:14:04 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
> Boris,
>
> On 05.09.2016 17:05, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > + * This function is called in case of a write failure and moves all good data
> > + * from the potentially bad physical eraseblock to a good physical eraseblock.
> > + * This function also writes the data which was not written due to the failure.
> > + * Returns 0 in case of success, and a negative error code in case of failure.
> > + * This function tries %UBI_IO_RETRIES before giving up.
> > + */
> > +static int recover_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int vol_id, int lnum,
> > + const void *buf, int offset, int len)
> > +{
> > + int err, idx = vol_id2idx(ubi, vol_id), tries;
> > + struct ubi_volume *vol = ubi->volumes[idx];
> > + struct ubi_vid_hdr *vid_hdr;
> > +
> > + vid_hdr = ubi_zalloc_vid_hdr(ubi, GFP_NOFS);
> > + if (!vid_hdr)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + for (tries = 0; tries <= UBI_IO_RETRIES; tries++) {
> > + err = try_recover_peb(vol, pnum, lnum, buf, offset, len,
> > + vid_hdr);
> > + if (!err || err == -ENOSPC)
> > + break;
>
> Why do you handle ENOSPC as fatal error? Since the loop is bound by UBI_IO_RETRIES
> IMHO we can retry also upon ENOSPC.
I was just trying to mimic the existing behavior: if ubi_wl_get_peb()
fails to return a free PEB it returns -ENOSPC, and the current
implementation does not retry in this case.
I also realize that we should not retry if the error happened when
reading from the source PEB.
Maybe we should have an extra 'bool *retry' parameter to let
recover_peb() know whether the operation should be retried or not.
What do you think?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] UBI: simplify recover_peb() code Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-09-16 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] UBI: simplify recover_peb() code Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-09-16 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] UBI: simplify recover_peb() code Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-09-16 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] UBI: simplify recover_peb() code Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-09-16 15:30 +0200
csiph-web