Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1481501
| From | Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps |
| Date | 2016-09-12 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sgBEC-5cu-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <se8x4-8O-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sgydI-35W-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon 05-09-16 16:14:06, robert.foss@collabora.com wrote: >> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com> >> >> This series provides the /proc/PID/totmaps feature, which >> summarizes the information provided by /proc/PID/smaps for >> improved performance and usability reasons. >> >> A use case is to speed up monitoring of memory consumption in >> environments where RSS isn't precise. >> >> For example Chrome tends to many processes which have hundreds of VMAs >> with a substantial amount of shared memory, and the error of using >> RSS rather than PSS tends to be very large when looking at overall >> memory consumption. PSS isn't kept as a single number that's exported >> like RSS, so to calculate PSS means having to parse a very large smaps >> file. >> >> This process is slow and has to be repeated for many processes, and we >> found that the just act of doing the parsing was taking up a >> significant amount of CPU time, so this patch is an attempt to make >> that process cheaper. > > I still maintain my concerns about a single pss value. It might work in > a very specific situations where the consumer knows what is shared but > other than that the value can be more misleading than helpful. So a NACK > from me until I am shown that this is usable in general and still > helpful. I know you think Pss isn't useful in general (though I'll point out two other independent people said they found it useful) but how about the other fields like Swap, Private_Dirty and Private_Shared? If we removed Pss would you still NACK it? > > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-12 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org> - 2016-09-12 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-12 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org> - 2016-09-12 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-13 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org> - 2016-09-13 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-14 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com> - 2016-09-19 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-19 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net> - 2016-09-19 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org> - 2016-09-19 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com> - 2016-09-20 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org> - 2016-09-20 02:40 +0200
csiph-web