Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1480210

Re: Regulator probe

From Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Regulator probe
Date 2016-09-09 19:10 +0200
Message-ID <sfxtn-5M5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <sfsWJ-2Il-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sftzr-2Vd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfw4h-4M9-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfwGZ-5gP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfx0n-5nv-69@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Intel Finland Oy

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:38 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:10:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 16:29 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > ...and then we correctly report that the optional supply that
> > > isn't
> > > mapped (as far as I remember) isn't there.
> 
> > 
> > But it *will be* soon there.
> 
> > 
> > Hmm... And the proper fix for this case is... (let's assume there
> > will
> > not be device tree solution in nearest future)?
> 
> To supply this particular mapping before you set full constraints.

Thanks for patience and explanation. I will look later how to achieve
this.

> 
> > 
> > If I remove has_full_constraints() call I will get EPROBE_DEFER on
> > all
> > optional regulators IIRC.
> 
> Yes.

Which basically means that's not a solution I'm trying to get.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Regulator probe Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-01 17:00 +0200
  Re: Regulator probe Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-09-01 17:40 +0200
    Re: Regulator probe Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-01 18:30 +0200
      Re: Regulator probe Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-09-02 00:10 +0200
        Re: Regulator probe Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-05 18:10 +0200
          Re: Regulator probe Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-09-06 12:40 +0200
            Re: Regulator probe Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-07 16:40 +0200
              Re: Regulator probe Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-09-09 14:20 +0200
                Re: Regulator probe Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-09 15:00 +0200
                Re: Regulator probe Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-09-09 17:40 +0200
                Re: Regulator probe Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-09 18:20 +0200
                Re: Regulator probe Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-09-09 18:40 +0200
                Re: Regulator probe Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-09 19:10 +0200
                Re: Regulator probe Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-09-09 19:20 +0200
                Re: Regulator probe Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-10 13:10 +0200
                Re: Regulator probe Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-09-12 17:30 +0200
                Re: Regulator probe Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-12 18:10 +0200

csiph-web