Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1479610

Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa

From "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa
Date 2016-09-09 04:10 +0200
Message-ID <sfjqp-5jW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <scu8F-5sK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sf5nt-53y-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 2016/9/8 19:01, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:54:51PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> v7 -> v8:
>> Updated patches according to Will Deacon's review comments, thanks.
>>
>> The changed patches is: 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15
>> Patch 3 requires an ack from Rob Herring.
>> Patch 10 requires an ack from linux-mm.
>>
>> Hi, Will:
>> Something should still be clarified:
>> Patch 5, I modified it according to my last reply. BTW, The last sentence
>>          "srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0" of arm64_acpi_numa_init should be moved
>>          into acpi_numa_init, I think.
>>          
>> Patch 9, I still leave the code in arch/arm64.
>>          1) the implementation of setup_per_cpu_areas on all platforms are different.
>>          2) Although my implementation referred to PowerPC, but still something different.
>>
>> Patch 15, I modified the description again. Can you take a look at it? If this patch is
>> 	  dropped, the patch 14 should also be dropped.
>>
>> Patch 16, How many times the function node_distance to be called rely on the APP(need many tasks
>>           to be scheduled), I have not prepared yet, so I give up this patch as your advise. 
> 
> Ok, I'm trying to pick the pieces out of this patch series and it's not
> especially easy. As far as I can tell:
> 
>   Patch 3 needs an ack from the device-tree folks
Rob just acked.

> 
>   Patch 10 needs an ack from the memblock folks
I'll immediately send a email to remind them.

> 
>   Patch 11 depends on patch 10
> 
>   Patches 14,15,16 can wait for the time being (I still don't see their
>   value).
OK, that's no problem. So I put them in the end beforehand.

> 
> So, I could pick up patches 1-2, 4-9 and 12-13 but it's not clear whether
Now you can also add patch 3.

> that makes any sense. The whole series seems to be a mix of trivial printk
The most valueable patches are: patch 2, 9, 11. The other is just because of a programmer wants the code to be nice.

> cleanups, a bunch of core OF stuff, some new features and then some
> questionable changes at the end.
> 
> Please throw me a clue,
> 
> Will
> 
> .
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
  [PATCH v8 05/16] arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
  [PATCH v8 07/16] of_numa: Use pr_fmt() Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
  [PATCH v8 04/16] of/numa: remove a duplicated warning Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
  [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function  memblock_alloc_near_nid "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-09 06:00 +0200
  [PATCH v8 12/16] arm64/numa: remove some useless code Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
  [PATCH v8 06/16] of_numa: Use of_get_next_parent to simplify code Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
  [PATCH v8 16/16] arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to simplify code Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
  [PATCH v8 01/16] of/numa: remove a duplicated pr_debug information Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:10 +0200
  [PATCH v8 02/16] of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-09-08 13:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-09 04:10 +0200

csiph-web