Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async

From	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async
Date	2016-09-06 09:20 +0200
Message-ID	<seiPL-7bK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <sca9X-E9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <scdhw-2vG-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <scw0N-7nt-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <scRyh-51C-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <scYq5-16w-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,

On (09/02/16 17:15), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > I meant that this thing
> > 
> > 	local_irq_save() // or preempt_disable()
> > 	...
> > 	if (console_trylock())
> > 		console_unlock();
> > 	...
> > 	local_irq_restore() // or preempt_enable()
> 
> I see.
> 
> > can easily lockup the system if console_trylock() was successful and there
> > are enough messages to print. printk_kthread can't help, because here we
> > basically enforce the `old' behavior. we have async printk, but not async
> > console output. tweaking console_unlock() to offload the actual printing loop
> > to printk_kthread would make the entire console output async:
> > 
> > 	static void console_sync_flush_and_unlock(void)
> > 	{
> > 		for (;;) {
> > 		...
> > 			call_console_drivers();
> > 		...
> > 		}
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	void console_unlock(void)
> > 	{
> > 		if (!MOTORMOUTH && can_printk_async()) {
> > 			up();
> > 			wake_up_process(printk_kthread);
> > 			return;
> > 		}
> > 		console_sync_flush_and_unlock();
> > 	}
> 
> Something like this would make sense. But I would do it in a separate
> patch(set). We need to go through all console_unlock() callers and
> make sure that they are fine with the potential async behavior.
> I would not complicate the async printk patchset by this.

sure. just added one more item to the list.

	-ss

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-08-25 23:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 04:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-08-30 11:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 04:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-08-31 11:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 15:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-09-01 11:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 10:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-09-02 17:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-09-06 09:20 +0200

csiph-web