Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1471919
| From | Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC v3] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier |
| Date | 2016-08-29 17:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sbwFz-yc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sa8ci-51E-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sa8YF-5nC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <saa4p-6jm-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <saGQF-23P-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, 2016-08-27 at 10:03 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 12:42:15 -0700 > > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > > > > > Why grabbing a lock instead of cmpxchg? > > > > ... and some more cleanups later, this might actually be > > good to merge, assuming it works for Benjamin :) > > > > ---8<--- > > LGTM in principle (it's a pretty clever trick!), just some minor > stylistic nits: Thanks for the review. I have applied the stylistic nits, and turned lazy_tlb_can_skip_flush into a big switch statement as suggested by Linus. > > + */ > > + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) > > + if (lazy_tlb_can_skip_flush(cpu)) > > + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, (struct cpumask > > *)cpumask); > > Please remove the 'const' from the cpumask type definition instead of > this ugly > cast! I played around with this on Thursday already, and ran out of time to clean that up before going to the next talk. This will be fixed in the next version. > I'd also like to wait for the Tested-by from Benjamin as well before > we can > proceeed. Agreed. Ben, a new version is coming up real soon. -- All Rights Reversed.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RFC UGLY] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-25 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC UGLY] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-25 22:00 +0200
[PATCH RFC v2] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-25 22:20 +0200
[PATCH RFC v3] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-25 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC v3] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-08-27 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC v3] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-08-28 01:10 +0200
[PATCH RFC v4] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-30 22:00 +0200
[PATCH RFC v5] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-30 23:10 +0200
[PATCH RFC v6] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-31 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC v6] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-09-08 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC v6] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Benjamin Serebrin <serebrin@google.com> - 2016-09-09 02:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC v6] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-09-09 06:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC v6] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-09 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC v3] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-29 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC UGLY] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-08-26 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC UGLY] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC UGLY] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-08-28 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC UGLY] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-29 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC UGLY] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-08-30 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC UGLY] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-08-30 03:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC UGLY] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-08-30 20:30 +0200
csiph-web