Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1558239

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying.

From Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying.
Date 2017-01-13 12:20 +0100
Message-ID <sZ83M-ay-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <sSBNf-4du-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sSBNf-4du-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sSBNf-4du-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sYNsm-4qh-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZ0fT-3DU-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri 2017-01-13 11:52:55, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/12/17 14:10), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > >  /**
> > >   * console_lock - lock the console system for exclusive use.
> > >   *
> > > @@ -2316,7 +2321,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(console_unlock);
> > >   */
> > >  void __sched console_conditional_schedule(void)
> > >  {
> > > -	if (console_may_schedule)
> > > +	if (get_console_may_schedule())
> > 
> > Note that console_may_schedule should be zero when
> > the console drivers are called. See the following lines in
> > console_unlock():
> > 
> > 	/*
> > 	 * Console drivers are called under logbuf_lock, so
> > 	 * @console_may_schedule should be cleared before; however, we may
> > 	 * end up dumping a lot of lines, for example, if called from
> > 	 * console registration path, and should invoke cond_resched()
> > 	 * between lines if allowable.  Not doing so can cause a very long
> > 	 * scheduling stall on a slow console leading to RCU stall and
> > 	 * softlockup warnings which exacerbate the issue with more
> > 	 * messages practically incapacitating the system.
> > 	 */
> > 	do_cond_resched = console_may_schedule;
> > 	console_may_schedule = 0;
> 
> 
> 
> console drivers are never-ever-ever getting called under logbuf lock.
> never. with disabled local IRQs - yes. under logbuf lock - no. that
> would soft lockup systems in really bad ways, otherwise.

Sure. It is just a misleading comment that someone wrote. I have
already fixed this in my patch.


> the reason why we set console_may_schedule to zero in
> console_unlock() is.... VT. and lf() function in particular.
> 
> commit 78944e549d36673eb6265a2411574e79c28e23dc
> Author: Antonino A. Daplas XXXX
> Date:   Sat Aug 5 12:14:16 2006 -0700
> 
>     [PATCH] vt: printk: Fix framebuffer console triggering might_sleep assertion
>     
>     Reported by: Dave Jones
>     
>     Whilst printk'ing to both console and serial console, I got this...
>     (2.6.18rc1)
>     
>     BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched.c:4438
>     in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1

This is basically the same problem that Testuo has. This commit added
the line

	console_may_schedule = 0;

Tetsuo found that we did not clear it when going back
via the "again:" goto target.


> and we really don't want to cond_resched() when we are in panic.
> that's why console_flush_on_panic() sets it to zero explicitly.

This actually works even with the bug. console_flush_on_panic()
is called with interrupts disabled in panic(). Therefore
console_trylock would disable cond_resched.

Best Regards,
Petr

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying. Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2017-01-12 14:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying. Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 04:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying. Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 05:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying. Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2017-01-13 12:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying. Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2017-01-13 12:20 +0100

csiph-web