Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1556843
| From | Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: exynos: replace to one register accessor from each accessors |
| Date | 2017-01-11 20:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sYwhP-21a-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sQ1kS-5f4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sQ1kT-5f4-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Jaehoon,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:16:11PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors.
> It can be replaced to one register accessor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 214 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> index f1c544b..6dbfa2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> @@ -102,197 +102,175 @@ struct exynos_pcie {
> #define PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_PD_TSV (0x1 << 7)
> #define PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_LVCC 0x31c
>
> -static void exynos_elb_writel(struct exynos_pcie *exynos_pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
> +static void exynos_pcie_writel(void __iomem *base, u32 val, u32 reg)
> {
> - writel(val, exynos_pcie->elbi_base + reg);
> + writel(val, base + reg);
> }
>
> -static u32 exynos_elb_readl(struct exynos_pcie *exynos_pcie, u32 reg)
> +static u32 exynos_pcie_readl(void __iomem *base, u32 reg)
> {
> - return readl(exynos_pcie->elbi_base + reg);
> + return readl(base + reg);
> }
>
> -static void exynos_phy_writel(struct exynos_pcie *exynos_pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
> -{
> - writel(val, exynos_pcie->phy_base + reg);
> -}
> -
> -static u32 exynos_phy_readl(struct exynos_pcie *exynos_pcie, u32 reg)
> -{
> - return readl(exynos_pcie->phy_base + reg);
> -}
> -
> -static void exynos_blk_writel(struct exynos_pcie *exynos_pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
> -{
> - writel(val, exynos_pcie->block_base + reg);
> -}
> -
> -static u32 exynos_blk_readl(struct exynos_pcie *exynos_pcie, u32 reg)
> -{
> - return readl(exynos_pcie->block_base + reg);
> -}
> -
> -static void exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_w_mode(struct exynos_pcie *exynos_pcie,
> - bool on)
> +static void exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_w_mode(struct exynos_pcie *ep, bool on)
Replacing all the separate accessors with one that takes the base
pointer is OK, but please use the same name for all the "struct
exynos_pcie *" pointers in the whole file.
Before your patch, they were all called "exynos_pci"; after it some
are called "exynos_pci" and some are called "ep".
Bjorn
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: exynos: replace to one register accessor from each accessors Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-01-11 20:00 +0100 Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: exynos: replace to one register accessor from each accessors Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> - 2017-01-12 02:20 +0100
csiph-web