Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1554441
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings |
| Date | 2017-01-09 17:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sXKGe-6kS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sXJAu-5tx-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXK3w-5SD-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXKmS-5Z0-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:40:19PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > There are two more that annoy me, but I don't know how to fix them: > > ata_scsi_rbuf - 4096 +4096 > ata_force_param_buf - 4096 +4096 ata_force_param_buf is __initdata and shouldn't really matter. ata_scsi_rbuf, hmmm, idk. Maybe we can allocate it dynamically when registering the first ATA device so that systems w/o them can avoid the wastage. Thanks. -- tejun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-01-09 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-09 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-01-09 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-09 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-01-09 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-01-09 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-09 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-01-09 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-01-09 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-09 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-01-09 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-09 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-01-09 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-09 21:40 +0100
csiph-web