Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1552377
| From | Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager |
| Date | 2017-01-05 23:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sWoHM-Jf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <sWiM1-5ja-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sWk1s-63E-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sWl7c-6J7-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <sWmmB-7rW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sWmmB-7rW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:55:49AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > We don't really have that choice: Keys require authorization, so you > have to have an auth session. I know, this is why I suggested a combo op (kernel level atomicity is clearly DOS safe).. > If you want things like PCR sealed or time limited keys, you don't > really have a choice on policy sessions either. .. and advanced stuff like is what I was talking about giving up for unpriv if it can't be allowed safely ... > I think we've got to the point where arguing about our divergent use > requirements shows the default should be 0600 and every command enabled > so that whatever changes the device to 0666 also applies the command Well, that is what we already have with /dev/tpm0. I'm very surprised by this level of disagreement, so I'm inclined to drop the idea that the kernel can directly support a 0666 cdev at all. Lets stick with the user space broker process and just introduce enough kernel RM to enable co-existance with kernel users and clean-up on crash. This should be enough to make a user space broker much simpler. So Jarkko's uapi is basically fine.. No need for a kernel white list/etc I had really hoped we could have a secure default 0666 cdev that would be able to support the basic use of your user space plugins without a daemon :( Jason
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RE: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager "Fuchs, Andreas" <andreas.fuchs@sit.fraunhofer.de> - 2017-01-05 17:10 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2017-01-05 18:30 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-05 19:10 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Andreas Fuchs <andreas.fuchs@sit.fraunhofer.de> - 2017-01-06 09:50 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-05 19:40 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2017-01-05 21:00 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-05 21:00 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2017-01-05 23:30 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2017-01-06 01:00 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-06 01:40 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Andreas Fuchs <andreas.fuchs@sit.fraunhofer.de> - 2017-01-06 10:10 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2017-01-06 20:20 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2017-01-06 20:10 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-06 02:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Ken Goldman <kgoldman@us.ibm.com> - 2017-01-10 20:20 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-09 23:40 +0100
Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager Andreas Fuchs <andreas.fuchs@sit.fraunhofer.de> - 2017-01-11 11:10 +0100
csiph-web