Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1549610
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] nodemask: Consider MAX_NUMNODES inside node_isset |
| Date | 2017-01-03 09:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sVsX7-3ui-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sVsDM-3nL-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue 03-01-17 13:57:53, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> node_isset can give incorrect result if the node number is beyond the
> bitmask size (MAX_NUMNODES in this case) which is not checked inside
> test_bit. Hence check for the bit limits (MAX_NUMNODES) inside the
> node_isset function before calling test_bit.
Could you be more specific when such a thing might happen? Have you seen
any in-kernel user who would give such a bogus node?
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/nodemask.h | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/nodemask.h b/include/linux/nodemask.h
> index 6e66cfd..0aee588b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nodemask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nodemask.h
> @@ -139,7 +139,13 @@ static inline void __nodes_clear(nodemask_t *dstp, unsigned int nbits)
> }
>
> /* No static inline type checking - see Subtlety (1) above. */
> -#define node_isset(node, nodemask) test_bit((node), (nodemask).bits)
> +#define node_isset(node, nodemask) node_test_bit(node, nodemask, MAX_NUMNODES)
> +static inline int node_test_bit(int node, nodemask_t nodemask, int maxnodes)
> +{
> + if (node >= maxnodes)
> + return 0;
> + return test_bit((node), (nodemask).bits);
> +}
>
> #define node_test_and_set(node, nodemask) \
> __node_test_and_set((node), &(nodemask))
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] nodemask: Consider MAX_NUMNODES inside node_isset Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-03 09:30 +0100
Re: [RFC] nodemask: Consider MAX_NUMNODES inside node_isset Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-03 09:50 +0100
Re: [RFC] nodemask: Consider MAX_NUMNODES inside node_isset Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-03 10:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] nodemask: Consider MAX_NUMNODES inside node_isset Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-03 10:20 +0100
Re: [RFC] nodemask: Consider MAX_NUMNODES inside node_isset Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-03 10:50 +0100
csiph-web