Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1545817

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal()

From Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal()
Date 2016-12-21 15:50 +0100
Message-ID <sQQno-4FS-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <sQ830-1eW-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sQvLX-80A-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sQJYB-xo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sQOYi-3Xt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sQP7X-40K-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:22:01PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Wed 21-12-16 13:13:32, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:51:16AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> >On Tue 20-12-16 16:48:23, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> >> >On Sun 18-12-16 14:47:50, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >> >> memblock_reserve() may fail in case there is not enough regions.
>> >> >
>> >> >Have you seen this happenning in the real setups or this is a by-review
>> >> >driven change?
>> >> 
>> >> This is a by-review driven change.
>> >> 
>> >> >[...]
>> >> >>  again:
>> >> >>  	alloc = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, min_addr, max_addr,
>> >> >>  					    nid, flags);
>> >> >> -	if (alloc)
>> >> >> +	if (alloc && !memblock_reserve(alloc, size))
>> >> >>  		goto done;
>> >
>> >So how exactly does the reserve fail when memblock_find_in_range_node
>> >found a suitable range for the given size?
>> >
>> 
>> Even memblock_find_in_range_node() gets a suitable range, memblock_reserve()
>> still could fail. And the case just happens when memblock can't resize.
>> memblock_reserve() reserve a range by adding a range to memblock.reserved. In
>> case the memblock.reserved is full and can't resize, this fails.
>
>Sorry for being dense but what does it mean that the reserved will get
>full? Also how probable is such a situation? Is it even real? In other
>words does this fix a real or only a theoretical problem?
>

This is a theoretical problem. While if happens, it is hard to detect. Future
allocator will think this range is still available.

>Anyway this all should be part of the changelog.

Ok, let me add this in changelog in next version.

>-- 
>Michal Hocko
>SUSE Labs

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH V2 0/2] mm/memblock.c: fix potential bug and code refine Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 15:50 +0100
  [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 15:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of  memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-19 16:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of  memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2016-12-20 17:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of  memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-21 09:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of  memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 14:20 +0100
            Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of  memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-21 14:30 +0100
              Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of  memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 15:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/memblock.c: check return value of  memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-21 16:00 +0100
  [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/memblock.c: trivial code refine in memblock_is_region_memory() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 15:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/memblock.c: trivial code refine in  memblock_is_region_memory() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-19 16:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/memblock.c: trivial code refine in  memblock_is_region_memory() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2016-12-20 17:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/memblock.c: trivial code refine in  memblock_is_region_memory() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-21 08:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/memblock.c: trivial code refine in  memblock_is_region_memory() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-21 13:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/memblock.c: trivial code refine in  memblock_is_region_memory() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 14:20 +0100
          Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/memblock.c: trivial code refine in  memblock_is_region_memory() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 13:50 +0100

csiph-web