Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1543917
| From | Pan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] KVM fixes for 4.10 merge window |
| Date | 2016-12-17 04:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sPdxM-3PD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sP41r-6cL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sP6FY-7TO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
在 2016/12/17 03:42, Linus Torvalds 写道:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/for-linus
>
> This piece-of-shit branch has obviously never been even compile-tested:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c: In function ‘__kvm_vcpu_is_preempted’:
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c:596:14: error: ‘struct kvm_steal_time’ has no
> member named ‘preempted’
>
hi, Linus
oh, my bad also. I introduce this struct member and use it in same patch.
Better to separate tem into two patches. I make one fix patch below. sorry again.
Hi, Paolo
I have known where is th problem, I think if we can set this ->preempted later after preempted_enable()
or just introduce something like write_guest_nosleep (per cpu memory section in guest, so there is no page_fault or any other cannot sleep problems)?
thanks
xinhui
-----------------
From d4fa3ea0b8b6f3e5ff511604a4a6665d1cbb74c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 02:56:33 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: fix compile issue
we revert commit 0b9f6c4615c993d2b552e0d2bd1ade49b56e5beb which calls
sleep function while preempt_disable on host part. But we remove struct
kvm_steal_time::preempted too. This casues compile problem as both guest
and host code use it.
Fix it by adding struct kvm_steal_time::preempted back.
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
index 94dc8ca..1421a65 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
@@ -45,7 +45,9 @@ struct kvm_steal_time {
__u64 steal;
__u32 version;
__u32 flags;
- __u32 pad[12];
+ __u8 preempted;
+ __u8 u8_pad[3];
+ __u32 pad[11];
};
#define KVM_STEAL_ALIGNMENT_BITS 5
--
2.4.11
> where commit b94c3698b4b0 ("Revert "x86/kvm: Support the vCPU
> preemption check"") removed the "preempted" field from struct
> kvm_steal_time, but you left this in place:
>
> __visible bool __kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> {
> struct kvm_steal_time *src = &per_cpu(steal_time, cpu);
>
> return !!src->preempted;
> }
>
> And no, that is not a merge artifact in my tree (although that
> function did come in from Ingo). That compile failure comes from your
> very own branch.
>
> Am I upset? You bet I am. Get your act together. You can't just
> randomly revert things without checking the end result.
>
> Linus
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[GIT PULL] KVM fixes for 4.10 merge window Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-12-16 18:00 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] KVM fixes for 4.10 merge window Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-12-16 20:50 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] KVM fixes for 4.10 merge window Pan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-12-17 04:10 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] KVM fixes for 4.10 merge window Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-12-17 09:30 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] KVM fixes for 4.10 merge window Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-12-17 09:30 +0100
csiph-web