Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1543163

RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast (de)inflating & fast live migration

From "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast (de)inflating & fast live migration
Date 2016-12-16 02:40 +0100
Message-ID <sOPF7-50D-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <sMlrP-7fm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sOdJw-4BA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sOGiu-7uh-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sOOSJ-4rO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sOPlM-4TI-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> On 12/15/2016 04:48 PM, Li, Liang Z wrote:
> >>> It seems we leave too many bit  for the pfn, and the bits leave for
> >>> length is not enough, How about keep 45 bits for the pfn and 19 bits
> >>> for length, 45 bits for pfn can cover 57 bits physical address, that
> >>> should be
> >> enough in the near feature.
> >>> What's your opinion?
> >> I still think 'order' makes a lot of sense.  But, as you say, 57 bits
> >> is enough for
> >> x86 for a while.  Other architectures.... who knows?
> 
> Thinking about this some more...  There are really only two cases that
> matter: 4k pages and "much bigger" ones.
> 
> Squeezing each 4k page into 8 bytes of metadata helps guarantee that this
> scheme won't regress over the old scheme in any cases.  For bigger ranges, 8
> vs 16 bytes means *nothing*.  And 16 bytes will be as good or better than
> the old scheme for everything which is >4k.
> 
> How about this:
>  * 52 bits of 'pfn', 5 bits of 'order', 7 bits of 'length'
>  * One special 'length' value to mean "actual length in next 8 bytes"
> 
> That should be pretty simple to produce and decode.  We have two record
> sizes, but I think it is manageable.

It works,  Now that we intend to use another 8 bytes for length

Why not:

Use 52 bits for 'pfn', 12 bits for 'length', when the 12 bits is not long enough for the 'length'
Set the 'length' to a special value to indicate the "actual length in next 8 bytes".

That will be much more simple. Right?

Liang

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for  fast (de)inflating & fast live migration "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-12-14 10:10 +0100
  Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast  (de)inflating & fast live migration Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2016-12-15 16:40 +0100
    Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for  fast (de)inflating & fast live migration "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-12-15 17:00 +0100
      RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for  fast (de)inflating & fast live migration "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-12-16 02:20 +0100
        Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for  fast (de)inflating & fast live migration Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> - 2016-12-16 16:50 +0100
          RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for  fast (de)inflating & fast live migration "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-12-17 13:00 +0100
    RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for  fast (de)inflating & fast live migration "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-12-16 01:50 +0100
      Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast  (de)inflating & fast live migration Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2016-12-16 02:20 +0100
        RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for  fast (de)inflating & fast live migration "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-12-16 02:40 +0100
          RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for  fast (de)inflating & fast live migration "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-12-16 02:50 +0100
          Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast  (de)inflating & fast live migration Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2016-12-16 02:50 +0100
            Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for  fast (de)inflating & fast live migration Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> - 2016-12-16 17:10 +0100
              RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for  fast (de)inflating & fast live migration "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-12-17 13:40 +0100

csiph-web