Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1541534
| From | Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: sctp: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage in sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport |
| Date | 2016-12-13 22:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sO2XM-6i5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sNZGy-4qu-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am getting the following reports while running syzkaller fuzzer:
>
> [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
> 4.9.0+ #85 Not tainted
> -------------------------------
> ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:572 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> 1 lock held by syz-executor1/18023:
> #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}, at: [< inline >] lock_sock
> include/net/sock.h:1454
> #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff87bb3ccf>]
> sctp_getsockopt+0x45f/0x6800 net/sctp/socket.c:6432
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 2 PID: 18023 Comm: syz-executor1 Not tainted 4.9.0+ #85
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15
> [< none >] dump_stack+0x2ee/0x3ef lib/dump_stack.c:51
> [< none >] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x139/0x180
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4448
> [< inline >] __rhashtable_lookup ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:572
> [< inline >] rhltable_lookup ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:660
> [< none >] sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport+0x641/0x930
> net/sctp/input.c:946
I think this was introduced in the rhlist converstion. We had removed
some rcu_read_lock() calls on sctp stack because rhashtable was already
calling it, but then we didn't add them back when moving to rhlist.
This code:
+/* return a transport without holding it, as it's only used under sock lock */
struct sctp_transport *sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport(
const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
const union sctp_addr *paddr)
{
struct net *net = sock_net(ep->base.sk);
+ struct rhlist_head *tmp, *list;
+ struct sctp_transport *t;
struct sctp_hash_cmp_arg arg = {
- .ep = ep,
.paddr = paddr,
.net = net,
+ .lport = htons(ep->base.bind_addr.port),
};
- return rhashtable_lookup_fast(&sctp_transport_hashtable, &arg,
- sctp_hash_params);
+ list = rhltable_lookup(&sctp_transport_hashtable, &arg,
+ sctp_hash_params);
Had an implicit rcu_read_lock() on rhashtable_lookup_fast, but it
doesn't on rhltable_lookup and rhltable_lookup uses _rcu calls which
assumes we have rcu read protection.
Marcelo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
sctp: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage in sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-12-13 19:10 +0100
Re: sctp: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage in sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 22:40 +0100
Re: sctp: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage in sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 11:10 +0100
csiph-web