Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1540233
| From | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo |
| Date | 2016-12-12 11:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sNvIv-30q-49@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <sMmxA-8aC-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sMnjY-8qN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sMrdT-2wK-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <sMHiF-3Mf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sMKzU-6fj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2016-12-08 22:57, Cong Wang wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> > I also tried to extend Cong Wang's idea to attempt to proactively respond to a >>>> > NETLINK_URELEASE on the audit_sock and reset it, but ran into a locking error >>>> > stack dump using mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex) in the notifier callback. >>>> > Eliminating the lock since the sock is dead anways eliminates the error. >>>> > >>>> > Is it safe? I'll resubmit if this looks remotely sane. Meanwhile I'll try to >>>> > get the test case to compile. >>>> >>>> It doesn't look safe, because 'audit_sock', 'audit_nlk_portid' and 'audit_pid' >>>> are updated as a whole and race between audit_receive_msg() and >>>> NETLINK_URELEASE. >>> >>> This is what I expected and why I originally added the mutex lock in the >>> callback... The dumps I got were bare with no wrapper identifying the >>> process context or specific error, so I'm at a bit of a loss how to >>> solve this (without thinking more about it) other than instinctively >>> removing the mutex. >> >> Netlink notifier can safely be converted to blocking one, I will send >> a patch. >> >> But I seriously doubt you really need NETLINK_URELEASE here, >> it adds nothing but overhead, b/c the netlink notifier is called on >> every netlink socket in the system, but for net exit path, that is >> relatively a slow path. >> >> Also, kauditd_send_skb() needs audit_cmd_mutex too. > > Please let me know what you think about the attached patch? Applied the patch locally and have not seen the bug since then (~24 hours of testing).
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-11-29 18:00 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 00:20 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 06:00 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-09 07:10 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 08:00 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-09 12:10 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 05:20 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 08:50 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-12-12 11:10 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-13 09:00 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-13 09:30 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-12 11:10 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 01:20 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-13 12:00 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 01:40 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-14 05:20 +0100
[RFC PATCH v3] audit: use proper refcount locking on audit_sock Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-13 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v3] audit: use proper refcount locking on audit_sock Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2016-12-13 22:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v3] audit: use proper refcount locking on audit_sock Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 01:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v3] audit: use proper refcount locking on audit_sock Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-14 05:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v3] audit: use proper refcount locking on audit_sock Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 07:40 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-12-09 11:50 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-09 12:50 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-12-09 13:00 +0100
Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-12-09 13:20 +0100
csiph-web