Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1540960
| From | Ian Arkver <ian.arkver.dev@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0 |
| Date | 2016-12-13 11:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sNSlH-8pl-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sNKxP-3oy-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sNRSF-7Zv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 13/12/16 09:43, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:58:02AM +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: >> As this is not in atomic context and it does not seem like a critical >> timing setting a range of 1ms allows the timer subsystem to optimize >> the hrtimer here. > I'd suggest not to. These delays are often directly visible to the user in > use cases where attention is indeed paid to milliseconds. > > The same applies to register accesses. An delay of 0 to 100 µs isn't much as > such, but when you multiply that with the number of accesses it begins to > add up. > Data sheet for this device [1] says STBYN deassertion to RSTN deassertion should be >50us, though this is actually referenced to MCLK startup. See Figure 36, Power-Up Sequence, page 42. I think the usleep range here could be greatly reduced and opened up to allow hr timer tweaks if desired. [1] http://www.bdtic.com/DataSheet/SAMSUNG/S5K6AAFX13.pdf Regards, Ian
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0 Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org> - 2016-12-13 03:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> - 2016-12-13 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0 Ian Arkver <ian.arkver.dev@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> - 2016-12-13 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0 Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> - 2016-12-13 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2016-12-13 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0 Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> - 2016-12-13 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0 Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> - 2016-12-15 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0 Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> - 2016-12-15 18:50 +0100
csiph-web