Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1539798
| From | Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK |
| Date | 2016-12-10 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sMLmh-73T-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sMJ18-57L-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sML2W-6Rq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 04:16:43PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > Why did you drop me from the CC list when you were replying to > my email? > Sorry --- this thread is Cc'ed to the kernel-hardening mailing list (which was somewhat recently revived), and I replied to the email that reached me from there. It looks like it currently behaves a little differently from the vger mailing lists, in that it replaces "Reply-To" with the address of the mailing list itself rather than the sender. So that's how you got dropped. It also seems to add a prefix to the subject... I > >> Are you sure? Any instance of *_ON_STACK must only be used with > >> sync algorithms and most drivers under drivers/crypto declare > >> themselves as async. > > > > Why exactly is that? Obviously, it wouldn't work if you returned from the stack > > frame before the request completed, but does anything stop someone from using an > > *_ON_STACK() request and then waiting for the request to complete before > > returning from the stack frame? > > The *_ON_STACK variants (except SHASH of course) were simply hacks > to help legacy crypto API users to cope with the new async interface. > In general we should avoid using the sync interface when possible. > > It's a bad idea for the obvious reason that most of our async > algorithms want to DMA and that doesn't work very well when you're > using memory from the stack. Sure, I just feel that the idea of "is this algorithm asynchronous?" is being conflated with the idea of "does this algorithm operate on physical memory?". Also, if *_ON_STACK are really not allowed with asynchronous algorithms can there at least be a comment or a WARN_ON() to express this? Thanks, Eric
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 00:10 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-12-10 06:30 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-12-10 06:40 +0100
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 07:10 +0100
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-12-10 09:20 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 09:40 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-12-10 06:40 +0100
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 07:40 +0100
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2016-12-10 15:50 +0100
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-12-10 18:50 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 07:00 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-12-11 20:20 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 00:40 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-12-12 19:40 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-12-13 04:40 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-12-13 18:10 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-12-14 06:00 +0100
Re: Remaining crypto API regressions with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-12-13 04:50 +0100
csiph-web