Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1538324

Re: [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries

From Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries
Date 2016-12-08 07:00 +0100
Message-ID <sLZUl-24r-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sDzDH-5Uj-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sL5yO-7xB-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 05/12/16 18:49, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> This is the third pass at my patchset to fix up our problems with
> XENMEM_machine_memory_map on large systems.  The only changes on this
> pass were to flesh out the comment above the E820_X_MAX definition, and
> to add Juergen's Reviewed-by to the second patch.
> 
> Let me know if anyone has any questions/comments!
> 
> Alex Thorlton (2):
>   x86: Make E820_X_MAX unconditionally larger than E820MAX
>   xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h | 12 ++++++++----
>  arch/x86/xen/setup.c        |  6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 

Ingo, do you have any preferences through which tree those patches
should go? I'd like to have at least patch 2 in 4.10, so I could take
it through the Xen tree.


Juergen

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com> - 2016-12-05 18:50 +0100
  [PATCH 1/2] x86: Make E820_X_MAX unconditionally larger than E820MAX Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com> - 2016-12-05 18:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Make E820_X_MAX unconditionally larger than  E820MAX Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2016-12-09 11:20 +0100
  [PATCH 2/2] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com> - 2016-12-05 19:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible  entries Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2016-12-09 11:20 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX  possible entries Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2016-12-08 07:00 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX  possible entries Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-12-09 04:50 +0100

csiph-web