Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1533800
| From | wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors |
| Date | 2016-12-01 05:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJrtL-7pP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <sJpBE-6at-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJqel-6I9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJqel-6I9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJqo1-6L9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJqo1-6L9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@redhat.com]
>Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 11:37 AM
>To: Michael S. Tsirkin
>Cc: wangyunjian; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; caihe
>Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors
>
>
>
>On 2016年12月01日 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:26:21AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On 2016年12月01日 11:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> > >On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:48:59AM +0000, wangyunjian wrote:
>>>>>> > > > >-----Original Message-----
>>>>>> > > > >From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst@redhat.com]
>>>>>> > > > >Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 9:41 PM
>>>>>> > > > >To: wangyunjian
>>>>>> > > > >Cc:jasowang@redhat.com;netdev@vger.kernel.org;linux-kernel@
>>>>>> > > > >vger.kernel.org; caihe
>>>>>> > > > >Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call
>>>>>> > > > >the recvmsg when meet errors
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > >On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 08:10:57PM +0800, Yunjian Wang wrote:
>>>>>>> > > > > >When we meet an error(err=-EBADFD) recvmsg,
>>>>>> > > > >How do you get EBADFD? Won't vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len
>>>>>> > > > >return 0 in this case, breaking the loop?
>>>>> > > >We started many guest VMs while attaching/detaching some virtio-net nics for loop.
>>>>> > > >The soft lockup might happened. The err is -EBADFD.
>>>>> > > >
>>>> > >OK, I'd like to figure out what happened here. why don't we get 0
>>>> > >when we peek at the head?
>>>> > >
>>>> > >EBADFD is from here:
>>>> > > struct tun_struct *tun = __tun_get(tfile); ...
>>>> > > if (!tun)
>>>> > > return -EBADFD;
>>>> > >
>>>> > >but then:
>>>> > >static int tun_peek_len(struct socket *sock) {
>>>> > >
>>>> > >...
>>>> > >
>>>> > > struct tun_struct *tun; ...
>>>> > > tun = __tun_get(tfile);
>>>> > > if (!tun)
>>>> > > return 0;
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >so peek len should return 0.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >then while will exit:
>>>> > > while ((sock_len = vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(net,
>>>> > >sock->sk))) ...
>>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >Consider this case: user do ip link del link tap0 before recvmsg()
>>> >but after
>>> >tun_peek_len() ?
>> Sure, this can happen, but I think we'll just exit on the next loop,
>> won't we?
>>
>
>Right, this is the only case I can image for -EBADFD, let's wait for the author to the steps.
>
Thanks, I understand it don't happen in the latest kernel version.
My problem happened using kernel version 3.10.0-xx
The peek len willn't return 0.
static int peek_head_len(struct sock *sk)
{
struct sk_buff *head;
int len = 0;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, flags);
head = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
if (likely(head)) {
len = head->len;
if (skb_vlan_tag_present(head))
len += VLAN_HLEN;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, flags);
return len;
}
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com> - 2016-11-30 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 14:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 14:50 +0100
RE: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com> - 2016-12-01 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 04:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 04:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 04:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 04:40 +0100
RE: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com> - 2016-12-01 05:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 06:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when meet errors Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 04:20 +0100
csiph-web