Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1533499
| From | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 |
| Date | 2016-11-30 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJhXs-1dw-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sJgRI-yy-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJhE5-17j-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJhNL-1aw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> wrote:
]>
> In my case I tracked this to commit 3637efb00864 ("x86/mce: Add PCI quirks to
> identify Xeons with machine check recovery") which adds the include for
> generated/autoksyms.h.
Ok, that at least makes some sense. The other blamed commit did not
seem to possibly make a difference.
> Searching LKML and I came across a report from Ken Moffat from a month ago:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147794681124332&w=2
Does a "make clean" get rid of it forever? Or does it come back?
If it's a one-time dependency issue that is because some header
dependency addition that the automatic dependency generator hadn't
caught, that might explain a bisection failure too: once the file
happens to get rebuilt (and the dependencies re-done), it starts
working even though the "happens to be rebuilt" had nothing to do with
the original bug.
Linus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 18:30 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-30 19:20 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 19:30 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-30 19:40 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 20:00 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 20:10 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-30 20:40 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-11-30 23:50 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 13:50 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 15:20 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 16:30 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> - 2016-12-01 00:20 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2016-11-30 22:00 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 22:10 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 22:40 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2016-11-30 22:50 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2016-11-30 23:00 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-12-01 00:50 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2016-12-01 10:10 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2016-12-01 14:50 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-12-01 18:50 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2016-12-01 21:20 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-12-02 21:20 +0100
Re: Odd build breakage in 4.9-rc7 Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> - 2016-12-02 23:50 +0100
csiph-web