Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1531816

Re: [PATCH] Lock down drivers that can have io ports, io mem, irqs and dma changed

From Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] Lock down drivers that can have io ports, io mem, irqs and dma changed
Date 2016-11-29 01:30 +0100
Message-ID <sIEt4-M9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sICKC-89o-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <sEgSm-rg-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <sEgfD-8mi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sG62u-7FV-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIEjn-IQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/28/2016 06:11 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> wrote:
>
>> This would prevent any IPMI interface from working if any address was given
>> on the kernel command line. I'm not sure what the best policy is, but that
>> sounds like a possible DOS to me.
> Okay, reasonable point.
>
>> Can you put this check in hardcode_find_bmc()?  Thats the only place where
>> the hardcoded addresses are used, and a check there won't affect anything
>> else.
> I could do that.  I presume you'd want hardcode_find_bmc() to return 1 in that
> case without doing anything else.  Another possibility is to give a warning
> and then clear ports[], addrs[] and irqs[].
>

Just returning -EPERM from that routine is fine, without doing anything
else.  You can basically just move your check to the top of that
routine.

>> Also, the error message sounds a little vague to me.  If I was a sysadmin
>> and got this, I wouldn't be sure what was going on.  Maybe something like:
>> The kernel is locked down, but hard-coded device addresses were given on
>> the driver command line.  Ignoring these, but this is a possible security
>> issue.
>>
>> That's fairly wordy, but it gets the point across.  You could also move the
>> pr_err() into kernel_is_locked_down() and pass in the prefix, since there is
>> basically the same pr_err() after every check.
> I don't think your suggested summary quite gets it right.  A lot of drivers,
> sound drivers, for example, that aren't really critical can simply be
> disabled - and some have to be disabled because there's no other way to
> configure them.

Yeah.  My main issue was that the sysadmin would see this and not
have any idea what was going on.

>
> It would have to be more like pr_err("Hard-coded device addresses, irqs and
> dma channels are not permitted when the kernel is locked down."), possibly
> with the addition of either "The driver has been disabled" or "These settings
> have been ignored".

That sounds better than what I had.

-corey

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] Lock down drivers that can have io ports, io mem, irqs  and dma changed Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> - 2016-11-28 23:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Lock down drivers that can have io ports, io mem, irqs and dma changed David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-29 01:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Lock down drivers that can have io ports, io mem, irqs  and dma changed Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> - 2016-11-29 01:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Lock down drivers that can have io ports, io mem, irqs and dma changed David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-29 15:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Lock down drivers that can have io ports, io mem, irqs  and dma changed Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> - 2016-11-29 15:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Lock down drivers that can have io ports, io mem, irqs  and dma changed One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-11-30 15:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] Lock down drivers that can have io ports, io mem, irqs and dma changed David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-30 17:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Lock down drivers that can have io ports, io mem, irqs and dma changed David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-29 11:50 +0100

csiph-web