Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1530166

Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE()

From Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE()
Date 2016-11-25 13:30 +0100
Message-ID <sHnND-wd-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sGZrY-1oP-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sH8Yh-7HV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sHmRA-8kF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sHn1g-8nO-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 11/25/2016 12:22 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:36:58PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> Though I really question the whole _ONCE APIs esp with
> >> aggregate types - these seem to generate a memcpy and
> >> an 8-byte read/writes sometimes, and I'm pretty sure this simply
> >> can't be read/written at once on all architectures.
> > 
> > Yes, in cases where the access is larger than the machine can perform in
> > a single access, this will result in a memcpy.
> > 
> > My understanding is that this has always been the case with
> > ACCESS_ONCE(), where multiple accesses were silently/implicitly
> > generated by the compiler.
> > 
> > We could add some compile-time warnings for those cases. I'm not sure if
> > there's a reason we avoided doing that so far; perhaps Christian has a
> > some idea.
> 
> My first version had this warning, but it was removed later on as requested
> by Linus
> 
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1503.3/02670.html
> ---snip---
> 
> Get rid of the f*cking size checks etc on READ_ONCE() and friends.
> 
> They are about - wait for it - "reading a value once".
> 
> Note how it doesn't say ANYTHING about "atomic" or anything like that.
> It's about reading *ONCE*.
> 
> ---snip---

I see. That's unfortunate, given that practically every use I'm aware of
assumes some atomicity (e.g. freedom from tearing when loading/storing
pointers or values up to the native width of the machine). I believe
that's the case here, for virtio, for example.

Perhaps we can add new accessors that are supposed to guarantee that,
into which we can drop appropriate warnings.

Naming will be problematic; calling them ATOMIC_* makes tham sound like
they work on atomic_t. That and I have no idea how to ensure correct
usage tree-wide; I'm not sure if/how Coccinelle can help.

Peter, thoughts?

Thanks,
Mark.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-24 11:30 +0100
  [PATCH 2/3] vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-24 11:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-11-24 12:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-11-24 12:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-11-25 03:50 +0100
  [PATCH 1/3] tools/virtio: fix READ_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-24 11:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] tools/virtio: fix READ_ONCE() Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-11-24 12:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] tools/virtio: fix READ_ONCE() Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-11-25 03:40 +0100
  [PATCH 3/3] tools/virtio: use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in uaccess.h Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-24 11:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] tools/virtio: use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in uaccess.h Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-11-24 12:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] tools/virtio: use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in uaccess.h Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-11-25 03:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-11-24 21:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-25 12:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-11-25 12:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-25 13:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-25 13:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-25 13:50 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 16:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-11-25 16:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-25 17:20 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-25 17:20 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-25 17:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-11-25 18:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-25 18:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-25 18:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-11-25 19:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-11-25 22:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-11-25 22:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-11-25 18:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-25 18:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-25 19:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-25 19:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-25 19:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio/vringh: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-25 15:40 +0100

csiph-web