Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1530660
| From | Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] tpm: add securityfs support for TPM 2.0 firmware event log |
| Date | 2016-11-26 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sHKKe-6IQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sGJwX-7LD-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGJwX-7LD-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <sH9AZ-8bP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sHuFr-4La-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo |
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:43:17PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:10:57PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:27:37PM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote: > > > Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does > > > not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the > > > firmware event log. > > > > > > This patch enables support for providing the TPM 2.0 event log in > > > binary form. TPM 2.0 event log supports a crypto agile format that > > > records multiple digests, which is different from TPM 1.2. This > > > patch enables the tpm_bios_log_setup for TPM 2.0 and adds the > > > event log parser which understand the TPM 2.0 crypto agile format. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > I don't want to say much about this before I've tested it. I wonder > > what cheap hardware I could use to test this. Any advice is on this > > from anyone is much appreciated. > > If you found a small ARM system with TPM you could customize the uboot > to build an event log and pass it in via DT. > > Not sure how much work that would be, does uboot have tpm code > already? I have BeagleBoard Rev C (omap3530 arm board) and it has GPIOs but at the moment I do not possess a spare dTPM module. I'll ask my employer for one. It's quite old (2009), which is a good thing because of range of support I would presume... If I get the spare dTPM I can do I2C/SPI through GPIOs as long as I find a way to inject stuff to DT. Hmm.. that said I've never done this before. I guess you can ask I2C/SPI driver somehow to use GPIOs? > Jason /Jarkko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] tpm: add securityfs support for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-11-25 20:50 +0100 Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] tpm: add securityfs support for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-11-26 14:00 +0100
csiph-web