Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1528030
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status |
| Date | 2016-11-23 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sGtip-5Rm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <sGgOd-61X-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sEw14-1T0-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <sG7hU-8nV-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGkyt-8rC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGpRw-3CL-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 |
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:47:27PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > > Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote: > > > The "out_efi_err" portion differs from the previous version of this > > > patch. Setting a __u8 to a negative value, is this really what you > > > want? > > > > Eh? efi_get_secureboot() returns an int as before. The out_efi_err: > > portions are exactly the same: > > By "the previous version of this patch" I was referring to your > submission of Nov 16, not the existing code in the kernel. > Your patch didn't contain the out_efi_err portion. > > You're assigning a negative value to boot_params->secure_boot > (which is declared __u8). Ah, yes. Sorry, you confused me by specifying a comparison against the last version. David
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-16 22:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-17 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-21 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-21 21:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-21 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-11-21 13:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-21 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-11-21 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-21 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-11-21 16:30 +0100
[PATCH 6/6] efi: Add EFI_SECURE_BOOT bit David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/6] efi: Add EFI_SECURE_BOOT bit Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 14:10 +0100
[PATCH 5/6] efi: Disable secure boot if shim is in insecure mode David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 5/6] efi: Disable secure boot if shim is in insecure mode Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 14:10 +0100
[PATCH 2/6] arm/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
[PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-11-22 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-11-22 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-11-22 18:00 +0100
[PATCH 3/6] efi: Add SHIM and image security database GUID definitions David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
[PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-11-22 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-23 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 21:40 +0100
csiph-web