Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1527702

Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services

From Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services
Date 2016-11-22 18:00 +0100
Message-ID <sGmAn-1lo-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <sEw14-1T0-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <sG7hU-8nV-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGk5r-8hE-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGlEe-BN-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGmqC-1ia-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 16:40 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> 
> > Umm, no, that's not correct.
> > SHA-1 lengths of 12 are unique for quite awhile yet.
> > 
> > https://blog.cuviper.com/2013/11/10/how-short-can-git-abbreviate/
> 
> The article says:
> 
> 	1.9% at 12
> 
> which is for 3253824 objects (I get 1.86%).
> 
> However, that was three years ago, and we now have over five million objects,
> so the collision possibility is 4.5% now.
> 
> If we add another 2 million over the next three years, then the probability
> will be over 8% then.
> 
> I've attached my spreadsheet for you to have a look at.
> 
> > No.  Use --format=email as appropriate instead.
> 
> Fix checkpatch.  This is an entirely reasonable supposition.

No.  There's nothing to fix there IMO.
Of course you are welcome to submit patches.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-16 22:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-17 15:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-21 12:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-21 21:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-21 12:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-11-21 13:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-21 13:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-11-21 14:20 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-21 16:20 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 02/16] efi: Get the secure boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-11-21 16:30 +0100
    [PATCH 6/6] efi: Add EFI_SECURE_BOOT bit David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 6/6] efi: Add EFI_SECURE_BOOT bit Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 14:10 +0100
    [PATCH 5/6] efi: Disable secure boot if shim is in insecure mode David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 5/6] efi: Disable secure boot if shim is in insecure mode Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 14:10 +0100
    [PATCH 2/6] arm/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
    [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime  services Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 11:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 15:20 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime  services Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-11-22 16:00 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 17:00 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime  services Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-11-22 17:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 17:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime  services Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-11-22 18:00 +0100
    [PATCH 3/6] efi: Add SHIM and image security database GUID  definitions David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
    [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 01:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 11:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-11-22 11:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 15:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 16:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 21:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-23 01:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-11-22 16:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-11-22 21:40 +0100

csiph-web