Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1527369
| From | Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 2/3] dt: bindings: add ethernet phy eee-disable-advert option documentation |
| Date | 2016-11-22 11:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sGglb-5Su-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <sFYRk-2Wx-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <sFZkr-3oh-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <sFZu1-3uU-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sFZX3-3Fn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGbYd-2YA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 21:35 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Le 21/11/2016 à 08:47, Andrew Lunn a écrit : > > > > > > > > What I did not realize when doing this patch for the realtek > > > driver is > > > that there is already 6 valid modes defined in the kernel > > > > > > #define MDIO_EEE_100TX MDIO_AN_EEE_ADV_100TX > > > /* > > > 100TX EEE cap */ > > > #define MDIO_EEE_1000T MDIO_AN_EEE_ADV_1000T > > > /* > > > 1000T EEE cap */ > > > #define MDIO_EEE_10GT 0x0008 /* 10GT EEE > > > cap */ > > > #define MDIO_EEE_1000KX 0x0010 /* 1000KX > > > EEE cap > > > */ > > > #define MDIO_EEE_10GKX4 0x0020 /* 10G KX4 > > > EEE cap > > > */ > > > #define MDIO_EEE_10GKR 0x0040 /* 10G KR EEE > > > cap > > > */ > > > > > > I took care of only 2 in the case of realtek.c since it only > > > support > > > MDIO_EEE_100TX and MDIO_EEE_1000T. > > > > > > Defining a property for each is certainly doable but it does not > > > look > > > very nice either. If it extends in the future, it will get even > > > more > > > messier, especially if you want to disable everything. > > > > Yes, agreed. > > One risk with the definition a group of advertisement capabilities > (under the form of a bitmask for instance) to enable/disable is that > we > end up with Device Tree contain some kind of configuration policy as > opposed to just flagging particular hardware features as broken. The code proposed only allows to disable EEE advertisement (not enable), so we should not see it used as a configuration policy in DT. To make this more explicit, I could replace the property "eee-advert- disable" by "eee-broken" ? > > Fortunately, there does not seem to be a ton of PHYs out there which > require EEE It is quite difficult to have the real picture here because some PHYs have EEE disabled by default and you have to explicitly enable it. I have no idea of the ratio between the 2 phy policies. > to be disabled to function properly so having individual > properties vs. bitmasks/groups is kind of speculative here. In the particular instance of the OdroidC2, disabling EEE for GbE only enough. However, If you have a PHY broken with, I think it is likely that you might want to disable all (supported) EEE modes. That's reason why I prefer bitmask. I agree both are functionally similar, this is kind of a cosmetic debate. > > Another approach to solving this problem could be to register a PHY > fixup which disables EEE at the PHY level, and which is only called > for > specific boards affected by this problem > (of_machine_is_compatible()). > This code can leave in arch/*/* when that is possible, That something I was looking at, but we don't have these files anymore on ARM64 (looking at your comment, you already know this) > or it can just be > somewhere where it is relevant, e.g; in the PHY driver for instance > (similarly to how PCI fixups are done). Do you prefer having board specific code inside generic driver than having the setting living in DT? Peppe told me they also had a few platform with similar issues. The point is that this could be useful to other people, so it could spread a grow a bit. I would prefer having this in the DT, but I can definitely do it the PHY with of_machine_is_compatible() and register_fixup is this what you prefer/want. Cheers Jerome
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH net v2 0/3] Fix OdroidC2 Gigabit Tx link issue Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> - 2016-11-21 16:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH net v2 2/3] dt: bindings: add ethernet phy eee-disable-advert option documentation Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> - 2016-11-21 16:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 2/3] dt: bindings: add ethernet phy eee-disable-advert option documentation Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-11-21 17:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 2/3] dt: bindings: add ethernet phy eee-disable-advert option documentation Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> - 2016-11-21 17:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 2/3] dt: bindings: add ethernet phy eee-disable-advert option documentation Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-11-21 17:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 2/3] dt: bindings: add ethernet phy eee-disable-advert option documentation Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 06:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 2/3] dt: bindings: add ethernet phy eee-disable-advert option documentation Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> - 2016-11-22 11:20 +0100
[RFC PATCH net v2 3/3] ARM64: dts: meson: odroidc2: disable advertisement EEE for GbE. Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> - 2016-11-21 16:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 0/3] Fix OdroidC2 Gigabit Tx link issue Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> - 2016-11-24 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 0/3] Fix OdroidC2 Gigabit Tx link issue Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> - 2016-11-24 17:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net v2 0/3] Fix OdroidC2 Gigabit Tx link issue Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> - 2016-11-24 18:30 +0100
csiph-web