Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1524482
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree |
| Date | 2016-11-17 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sEymd-3v8-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sEkjg-2JC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sEkVX-30x-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:49:29PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > doesn't look correct, if bio_readpage_error() is called from the > ->bi_end_io() handler. bi_size is generally zeroed at that time. At least some of these bios are magic btrfs-internal ones that never reach the block layer. But I don't think all are, and both the new code and one of the old cases are broken. David, can you drop this one patch for now, and I'll restart the discussion on the failfast behavior on the btrfs list?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-11-17 03:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2016-11-17 03:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2016-11-17 18:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> - 2016-11-18 18:50 +0100
csiph-web