Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

From	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree
Date	2016-11-18 18:50 +0100
Message-ID	<sEVst-1L1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sEkjg-2JC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sEkVX-30x-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sEymd-3v8-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:23:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:49:29PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > doesn't look correct, if bio_readpage_error() is called from the 
> > ->bi_end_io() handler. bi_size is generally zeroed at that time.
> 
> At least some of these bios are magic btrfs-internal ones that never
> reach the block layer.  But I don't think all are, and both the new
> code and one of the old cases are broken.  David, can you drop
> this one patch for now, and I'll restart the discussion on the
> failfast behavior on the btrfs list?

Ok, updated in today's for-next snapshot.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave  tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-11-17 03:10 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave  tree Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2016-11-17 03:50 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the         btrfs-kdave tree Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2016-11-17 18:10 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave  tree David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> - 2016-11-18 18:50 +0100

csiph-web