Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1521593
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 |
| Date | 2016-11-14 13:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sDofh-6Oy-71@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sDavD-5Ow-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDfOI-11Z-91@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Ted, On 14.11.2016 04:05, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Richard, > > Your fscrypt patches look good. I've created an fscrypt branch on the > ext4.git tree which contains your changes as well as Eric Bigger's > recent fspatch cleanups changes. If you want to base your ubifs > changes on that branch, that would be great. The ext4 dev branch will > be including that fscrypt branch, so it will be feeding into > linux-next that way. If you also base your patches on that, it will > avoid duplicate patches in linux-next and in Linus's tree when he > pulls them. Will do! > One quick question. When ubifs uses subpage blocks, can you assume that > they are always powers of two? Or more to the point, can you assume > that it will always be a multiple of the cipher's blocksize? Yes, UBIFS takes care about that. Subpage blocks are always a multiple of FS_CRYPTO_BLOCK_SIZE. Thanks, //richard
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-13 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-11-14 04:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-14 13:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-25 09:20 +0100
csiph-web