Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1521593

Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1

From Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1
Date 2016-11-14 13:10 +0100
Message-ID <sDofh-6Oy-71@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sDavD-5Ow-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDfOI-11Z-91@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Ted,

On 14.11.2016 04:05, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Richard,
> 
> Your fscrypt patches look good.  I've created an fscrypt branch on the
> ext4.git tree which contains your changes as well as Eric Bigger's
> recent fspatch cleanups changes.  If you want to base your ubifs
> changes on that branch, that would be great.  The ext4 dev branch will
> be including that fscrypt branch, so it will be feeding into
> linux-next that way.  If you also base your patches on that, it will
> avoid duplicate patches in linux-next and in Linus's tree when he
> pulls them.

Will do!

> One quick question.  When ubifs uses subpage blocks, can you assume that
> they are always powers of two?  Or more to the point, can you assume
> that it will always be a multiple of the cipher's blocksize?

Yes, UBIFS takes care about that. Subpage blocks are always a multiple of
FS_CRYPTO_BLOCK_SIZE.

Thanks,
//richard

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-13 22:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-11-14 04:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-14 13:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-25 09:20 +0100

csiph-web