Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1521040

Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1

From Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1
Date 2016-11-14 04:10 +0100
Message-ID <sDfOI-11Z-91@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sDavD-5Ow-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Richard,

Your fscrypt patches look good.  I've created an fscrypt branch on the
ext4.git tree which contains your changes as well as Eric Bigger's
recent fspatch cleanups changes.  If you want to base your ubifs
changes on that branch, that would be great.  The ext4 dev branch will
be including that fscrypt branch, so it will be feeding into
linux-next that way.  If you also base your patches on that, it will
avoid duplicate patches in linux-next and in Linus's tree when he
pulls them.

One quick question.  When ubifs uses subpage blocks, can you assume that
they are always powers of two?  Or more to the point, can you assume
that it will always be a multiple of the cipher's blocksize?

						- Ted

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-13 22:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-11-14 04:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-14 13:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-25 09:20 +0100

csiph-web