Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1520308
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled |
| Date | 2016-11-12 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCKKR-5h7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <sAVAK-62m-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAWGu-6RG-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAWGu-6RG-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <sB8eC-5Nz-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBcBA-bB-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:15:51AM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Nov 7, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:10:14PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > >> > >> ----- On Nov 7, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com > >> wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:08:59PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > >> >> ----- On Nov 3, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:29:28AM -0600, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > >> >> >> Userspace applications should be allowed to expect the membarrier system > >> >> >> call with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED command to issue memory barriers on > >> >> >> nohz_full CPUs, but synchronize_sched() does not take those into > >> >> >> account. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Given that we do not want unrelated processes to be able to affect > >> >> >> real-time sensitive nohz_full CPUs, simply return ENOSYS when membarrier > >> >> >> is invoked on a kernel with enabled nohz_full CPUs. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > >> >> >> CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >> >> > > >> >> > Acked-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >> >> > >> >> Hi Paul, > >> >> > >> >> Do you plan to pick it up through your tree, or I should sent > >> >> it directly to Linus ? > >> > > >> > Your choice. I believe that the original went some other way, but I > >> > would be fine carrying this one. > >> > >> Not sure what you mean by "the original" ? And which other way ? > >> I have not been notified about this. > > > > If I remember correctly, you sent the original sys_membarrier() > > patch through akpm or similar. > > Ah right, the original implementation, yes. > > > > >> If you can carry this patch it would be very much appreciated, > > > > Will do! > > Especially since the regression is somewhat related to RCU > behavior wrt nohz_full, getting it through your tree seems > relevant. I have it queued for 4.11, thank you! Thanx, Paul
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-11-03 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-03 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-11-07 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-11-07 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-08 07:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-11-08 12:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-12 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-07 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 08:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-11-17 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-11-17 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-11-17 18:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-11-17 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-11-17 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-17 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-17 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-17 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix: disable sys_membarrier when nohz_full is enabled "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-17 18:30 +0100
csiph-web