Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1515597

Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3

From Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3
Date 2016-11-05 18:50 +0100
Message-ID <sAdgl-2qi-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <szJ8C-8ib-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <szZwK-2fH-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sA2XD-4uc-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can you please clarify your objection?

There are several:

 - timing. No way in hell will I take a new feature like this during an rc

 - lack of explanation. Why is this bad feature needed in the first
place? Why would overlayfs versioning _ever_ be a good idea?

 - is the implementation even sane? Right now I don't think overlayfs
even requires xattr support in the upper filesystem, so the whole
concept seems frankly totally misdesigned.

> I suppose you do not object to the concept of on-disk format version nor on-disk
> format compatible/incompatible features sets.

I object both to the concept and to the implementation and to the
timing. The thing seems broken. Doing it during the rc cycle makes it
doubly so.

> Just to fact that overlayfs didn't have those form day one, so it
> should find a way to cope with that situation without patching
> stable kernels?

What "situation"? There's no f*cking explanation of why we'd even want
this crap. Not in the commit message, not in the pull request, not
*anywhere*.

And then the commit marks that shit for stable? When it clearly
doesn't fix anything, and it has never ever been needed before?

NO.

               Linus

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> - 2016-11-04 10:40 +0100
  Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-05 04:10 +0100
    Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 07:50 +0100
      Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-05 18:50 +0100
        Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> - 2016-11-05 20:50 +0100
          Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-05 22:40 +0100

csiph-web