Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1515508
| From | Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 |
| Date | 2016-11-05 07:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sA2XD-4uc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <szJ8C-8ib-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <szZwK-2fH-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote: >> >> Also introduce the concept of feature flags to allow backward incompatible >> changes to the overlay format. This should have been there from day one; the >> best we can do now is backport to stable kernels. Add the check for features >> without adding any actual features yet. > > No. I pulled the three other commits, but not that last one. > > That feature just seems to actively *encourage* backwards incompatible > features. It's a bad idea. Don't do it. If we've been able to do > without it so far, then why should we suddenly start doing things like > this? > > So I don't agree that it should have been there since day one, it just > shouldn't exist at all. > Linus, Can you please clarify your objection? I suppose you do not object to the concept of on-disk format version nor on-disk format compatible/incompatible features sets. Just to fact that overlayfs didn't have those form day one, so it should find a way to cope with that situation without patching stable kernels? Thanks, Amir.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> - 2016-11-04 10:40 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-05 04:10 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 07:50 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-05 18:50 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> - 2016-11-05 20:50 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 4.9-rc3 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-05 22:40 +0100
csiph-web