Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1516545
| From | Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: Prevent memcg caches to be both OFF_SLAB & OBJFREELIST_SLAB |
| Date | 2016-11-07 21:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sAYff-7Eq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <sz6gV-8vT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <szeo9-55A-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <szwXL-lr-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAXjc-74X-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAXMd-7uI-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Thomas Garnier wrote: > >> I am not sure that is possible. kmem_cache_create currently check for >> possible alias, I assume that it goes against what memcg tries to do. > > What does aliasing have to do with this? The aliases must have the same > flags otherwise the caches would not have been merged. > I assume there might be cases where the parent cache and the new memcg cache are compatible for merge (same flags and size). We can bypass that by adding SLAB_NEVER_MERGE but I am not sure what is the consequence of that. >> Separate the changes in two patches might make sense: >> >> 1) Fix the original bug by masking the flags passed to create_cache >> 2) Add flags check in kmem_cache_create. >> >> Does it make sense? > > Sure. > Great, I will send both patches. >> > I also want to make sure that there are no other callers that specify >> > extraneou flags while we are at it. >> I will review as many as I can but we might run into surprises (quick >> boot on defconfig didn't show anything). That's why having two >> different patches might be useful. > > These surprises can be caught later ... Just make sure that the core works > fine with this. You cannot audit all drivers. > Okay, I will. -- Thomas
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] memcg: Prevent memcg caches to be both OFF_SLAB & OBJFREELIST_SLAB Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2016-10-31 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: Prevent memcg caches to be both OFF_SLAB & OBJFREELIST_SLAB David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2016-11-01 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: Prevent memcg caches to be both OFF_SLAB & OBJFREELIST_SLAB Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2016-11-02 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: Prevent memcg caches to be both OFF_SLAB & OBJFREELIST_SLAB David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2016-11-03 01:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: Prevent memcg caches to be both OFF_SLAB & OBJFREELIST_SLAB Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2016-11-03 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: Prevent memcg caches to be both OFF_SLAB & OBJFREELIST_SLAB Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2016-11-07 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: Prevent memcg caches to be both OFF_SLAB & OBJFREELIST_SLAB Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2016-11-07 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: Prevent memcg caches to be both OFF_SLAB & OBJFREELIST_SLAB Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2016-11-07 21:00 +0100
csiph-web