Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1468031

Re: [PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre 2.6

From Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre 2.6
Date 2016-08-22 22:40 +0200
Message-ID <s94aJ-2HA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <s7WRY-HP-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7XXI-1oQ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7Yh4-1KJ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <s91wf-Tx-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <s91FU-WO-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:55:42AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 18:41 +0100, James Simmons wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 20:44 +0100, James Simmons wrote:
> 
> Hi again James.
> 
> > > I don't _need_ anything, but I think it'd be simpler to
> > > have just 2 directories, one for lustre kernel stuff
> > > and another for lustre uapi stuff.
> > > 
> > > That applies for LNet and libcfs #includes as well.
> > > 
> > > To me, ideally, there'd only be 2 #include directories
> > > so that the only used #include styles could become:
> > > 
> > > #include 
> > > and
> > > #include 
> > > 
> > > and that would work regardless of lustre's layout
> > > in staging or elsewhere.
> > I didn't expect this to be requested at this time. I thought this would beĀ 
> > addressed just before we left staging.
> 
> Sooner is better to me, but that's up to you all.

No, please, let's wait, there's still lots of "real" work to be done in
the lustre code before messing with the .h files like this.

James, please just continue the great work you are doing so far, all is
fine :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre 2.6 James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-08-19 20:10 +0200
  [PATCH 7/7] staging: lustre: update version to 2.5.99 James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-08-19 20:10 +0200
  [PATCH 2/7] staging: lustre: llite: move dir cache to MDC layer James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-08-19 20:10 +0200
  [PATCH 5/7] staging: lustre: obd: remove dead code James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-08-19 20:10 +0200
  [PATCH 3/7] staging: lustre: obd: remove unused lmv_readpages()/mdc_readpage() James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-08-19 20:10 +0200
  [PATCH 1/7] staging: lustre: lmv: implement lmv version of read_page James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-08-19 20:10 +0200
  [PATCH 4/7] staging: lustre: mdt: add OBD_CONNECT_DIR_STRIPE flag James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-08-19 20:10 +0200
  [PATCH 6/7] staging: lustre: obd: decruft md_enqueue() and md_intent_lock() James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-08-19 20:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre 2.6 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-19 20:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre  2.6 James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-08-19 21:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre 2.6 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-19 22:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre  2.6 James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-08-22 19:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre 2.6 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-22 20:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre 2.6 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-08-22 22:40 +0200

csiph-web