Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1462868
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed |
| Date | 2016-08-15 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s6rGy-7aD-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s3gRp-2h2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s6pv3-5Eh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 01:42:58PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> (Cc'ing Boris and Dave)
>
> On Fri, 05 Aug, at 06:59:35PM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> > This is a simple change to add in the physical mappings as well as the
> > virtual mappings in efi_map_region_fixed. The motivation here is to
> > get access to EFI runtime code that is only available via the 1:1
> > mappings on a kexec'd kernel.
So I don't understand: the whole jumping through hoops so that we have
stable virtual mappings just so that the kexec-ed kernel can call EFI
runtime, is now useless?!
What if the physical address is occupied by the kexec kernel?
Why do you guys need the physical mapping all of a sudden?
Your patch is basically rendering all the effort moot and we could've
saved ourselves all that trouble of doing all that virtual address
mapping and done the 1:1 thing.
Which really is probably simpler since we have an EFI-specific page
table and running EFI in the kexec-ed kernel would mean basically
recreating it.
What am I missing?
commit d2f7cbe7b26a74dbbbf8f325b2a6fd01bc34032c
Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Date: Thu Oct 31 17:25:08 2013 +0100
x86/efi: Runtime services virtual mapping
We map the EFI regions needed for runtime services non-contiguously,
with preserved alignment on virtual addresses starting from -4G down
for a total max space of 64G. This way, we provide for stable runtime
services addresses across kernels so that a kexec'd kernel can still use
them.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-08-15 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-08-15 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com> - 2016-08-15 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-08-16 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-08-16 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-08-16 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com> - 2016-08-16 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2016-08-17 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com> - 2016-08-17 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2016-08-18 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-08-16 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-08-16 15:40 +0200
csiph-web