Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1463870
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/8] Remove deprecated workqueue interface users |
| Date | 2016-08-16 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s6O0p-4mE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s5JPb-3AR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <s6z1n-3il-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s6Aqu-4jk-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, Sebastian. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:23:21AM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > At least the charger monitoring is timing critical: Many charger > chips must be monitored (e.g. for over-temp. events). I think > all of them have a self-protection, or a watchdog, so they would > actually stop charging instead of overheating, but that may result > in system failure due to power loss. Battery monitors also include > some temperture safety checks. So without careful case-by-case > checking the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM should not be removed IMHO. Thanks for the clarification. Yeah, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM seems like the right call. Thanks. -- tejun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/8] Remove deprecated workqueue interface users Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 18:20 +0200
[PATCH 1/8] power: abx500_chargalg: Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Remove deprecated workqueue interface users Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-08-16 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Remove deprecated workqueue interface users Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> - 2016-08-16 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Remove deprecated workqueue interface users Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-08-16 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Remove deprecated workqueue interface users Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> - 2016-08-16 01:00 +0200
csiph-web