Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1461744

Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err()

From SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err()
Date 2016-08-14 11:30 +0200
Message-ID <s5ZqW-5AD-45@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (15 earlier) <s4Qzn-70w-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4R2p-7bt-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <s5qCR-632-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s5F8R-8N-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s5L4B-4kc-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> I think pr_<level> is OK if reworking the code
> to support dev_<level> is not easy.

Thanks for this explanation. - It sounds more constructive than the previous short
feedback "Not correct".


>> Would you accept that another update will be appended to the discussed patch series?
> 
> No.  Patches should not knowingly introduce defects
> that are corrected in follow-on patches.

This view is fine in principle.

I am just curious on the preferred sequence to fix the affected implementation details.

1. I imagine that my questionable update suggestion "[PATCH v2 08/10] staging: ks7010:
   Replace three printk() calls by pr_err()" can be skipped and the remaining logging
   calls will be improved somehow a bit later.

Or:

2. Do you want a resend of this whole patch series?


>>> alloc_etherdev already does a dump_stack so the OOM isn't useful.
>> Does this information indicate that this printk() (or pr_err()) call
>> should be deleted?
> 
> Markus, I don't know if it's your lack of English
> comprehension or not, but it's fairly obvious from
> my reply that this line should be deleted,

I was unsure if this view fits to a consensus also by other developers.

It might be that I can occasionally become picky to check if other contributors
insist on the usage of a specific error message.


> either in this patch or a follow-on.

I would prefer another addition (or source code clean-up) later.
Could it happen that so many error messages are update candidates (for deletion)
so that no places remain where a pr_err() call would make sense in this
software module?

Regards,
Markus

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 00/10] staging: ks7010: Fine-tuning for a SDIO card driver SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 07:20 +0200
  [PATCH v2 02/10] staging: ks7010: Delete unnecessary assignments for  buffer variables SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 07:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 01/10] staging: ks7010: Delete unnecessary checks before  the function call "kfree" SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 07:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 04/10] staging: ks7010: Rename jump labels SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 07:40 +0200
  [PATCH v2 03/10] staging: ks7010: Return directly after a failed  kmalloc() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 07:40 +0200
  [PATCH v2 05/10] staging: ks7010: Delete unnecessary uses of the  variable "retval" SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 07:40 +0200
  [PATCH v2 06/10] staging: ks7010: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 07:50 +0200
  [PATCH v2 07/10] staging: ks7010: Add the macro "pr_fmt" SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 07:50 +0200
  [PATCH v2 08/10] staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by  pr_err() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 07:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls  by pr_err() Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-12 21:50 +0200
      Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-13 13:20 +0200
        Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err() Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-13 19:40 +0200
          Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err() Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-14 11:00 +0200
            Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-14 12:10 +0200
              Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-14 13:10 +0200
          Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-14 11:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 09/10] staging: ks7010: Delete a variable in  write_to_device() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 08:00 +0200
  [PATCH v2 10/10] staging: ks7010: Delete three unnecessary variable  initialisations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-11 08:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] staging: ks7010: Fine-tuning for a SDIO card  driver SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-14 12:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] staging: ks7010: Fine-tuning for a SDIO card  driver Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-08-14 14:10 +0200

csiph-web