Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1458837

Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: cpsw: fix kmemleak false-positive reports for sk buffers

From Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: cpsw: fix kmemleak false-positive reports for sk buffers
Date 2016-08-09 17:20 +0200
Message-ID <s4gYV-Rn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s4eaJ-7rr-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:09:44PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index 0805855..0456e0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -732,6 +732,7 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
>  		netif_receive_skb(skb);
>  		ndev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
>  		ndev->stats.rx_packets++;
> +		kmemleak_not_leak(new_skb);
>  	} else {
>  		ndev->stats.rx_dropped++;
>  		new_skb = skb;
> @@ -1323,6 +1324,7 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>  				kfree_skb(skb);
>  				goto err_cleanup;
>  			}
> +			kmemleak_not_leak(skb);

Nitpick: I would add a short comment above the kmemleak_not_leak() calls
on why there is a false positive. Otherwise:

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] drivers: net: cpsw: fix kmemleak false-positive reports for sk buffers Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2016-08-09 14:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: cpsw: fix kmemleak false-positive reports  for sk buffers Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-08-09 17:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: cpsw: fix kmemleak false-positive reports  for sk buffers Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com> - 2016-08-10 20:10 +0200

csiph-web