Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1458784

Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time

From Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time
Date 2016-08-09 16:10 +0200
Message-ID <s4fTc-bN-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rUtNM-4qs-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUtNN-4qs-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <s46mR-2aM-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:59 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi Rik,
> 2016-07-13 22:50 GMT+08:00 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>:
> > From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Currently, if there was any irq or softirq time during 'ticks'
> > jiffies, the entire period will be accounted as irq or softirq
> > time.
> > 
> > This is inaccurate if only a subset of the time was actually spent
> > handling irqs, and could conceivably mis-count all of the ticks
> > during
> > a period as irq time, when there was some irq and some softirq
> > time.
> > 
> > This can actually happen when irqtime_account_process_tick is
> > called
> > from account_idle_ticks, which can pass a larger number of ticks
> > down
> > all at once.
> > 
> > Fix this by changing irqtime_account_hi_update,
> > irqtime_account_si_update,
> > and steal_account_process_ticks to work with cputime_t time units,
> > and
> > return the amount of time spent in each mode.
> 
> Do we need to minus st cputime from idle cputime in
> account_idle_ticks() when noirqtime is true? I try to add this logic
> w/ noirqtime and idle=poll boot parameter for a full dynticks guest,
> however, there is no difference, where I miss?

Yes, you are right. The code in account_idle_ticks()
could use the same treatment.

I am not sure why it would not work, though...

-- 

All Rights Reversed.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 06:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq  time Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-09 16:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 21:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:40 +0200
        [PATCH] time,virt: resync steal time when guest & host lose sync Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-10 20:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 22:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq  time Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-10 23:30 +0200

csiph-web