Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1458784
| From | Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time |
| Date | 2016-08-09 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s4fTc-bN-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rUtNM-4qs-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUtNN-4qs-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <s46mR-2aM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:59 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: > Hi Rik, > 2016-07-13 22:50 GMT+08:00 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>: > > From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> > > > > Currently, if there was any irq or softirq time during 'ticks' > > jiffies, the entire period will be accounted as irq or softirq > > time. > > > > This is inaccurate if only a subset of the time was actually spent > > handling irqs, and could conceivably mis-count all of the ticks > > during > > a period as irq time, when there was some irq and some softirq > > time. > > > > This can actually happen when irqtime_account_process_tick is > > called > > from account_idle_ticks, which can pass a larger number of ticks > > down > > all at once. > > > > Fix this by changing irqtime_account_hi_update, > > irqtime_account_si_update, > > and steal_account_process_ticks to work with cputime_t time units, > > and > > return the amount of time spent in each mode. > > Do we need to minus st cputime from idle cputime in > account_idle_ticks() when noirqtime is true? I try to add this logic > w/ noirqtime and idle=poll boot parameter for a full dynticks guest, > however, there is no difference, where I miss? Yes, you are right. The code in account_idle_ticks() could use the same treatment. I am not sure why it would not work, though... -- All Rights Reversed.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 06:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-09 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:40 +0200
[PATCH] time,virt: resync steal time when guest & host lose sync Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-10 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-10 23:30 +0200
csiph-web