Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1458389
| From | Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time |
| Date | 2016-08-09 06:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s46mR-2aM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rUtNM-4qs-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUtNN-4qs-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Rik, 2016-07-13 22:50 GMT+08:00 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>: > From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> > > Currently, if there was any irq or softirq time during 'ticks' > jiffies, the entire period will be accounted as irq or softirq > time. > > This is inaccurate if only a subset of the time was actually spent > handling irqs, and could conceivably mis-count all of the ticks during > a period as irq time, when there was some irq and some softirq time. > > This can actually happen when irqtime_account_process_tick is called > from account_idle_ticks, which can pass a larger number of ticks down > all at once. > > Fix this by changing irqtime_account_hi_update, irqtime_account_si_update, > and steal_account_process_ticks to work with cputime_t time units, and > return the amount of time spent in each mode. Do we need to minus st cputime from idle cputime in account_idle_ticks() when noirqtime is true? I try to add this logic w/ noirqtime and idle=poll boot parameter for a full dynticks guest, however, there is no difference, where I miss? Regards, Wanpeng Li
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 06:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-09 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 01:40 +0200
[PATCH] time,virt: resync steal time when guest & host lose sync Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-10 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched,time: Count actually elapsed irq & softirq time Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-08-10 23:30 +0200
csiph-web