Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1460208

Re: [v2 PATCH] clk: rockchip: mark rk3399 hdcp_noc and vio_noc as critical

From Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [v2 PATCH] clk: rockchip: mark rk3399 hdcp_noc and vio_noc as critical
Date 2016-08-11 09:10 +0200
Message-ID <s4ShP-8tK-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s4jDs-2Cu-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4K0V-2GI-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2016, 15:14:06 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> > Fix incorrect rk3399 aclk_vio gating bit, it should be 0, not 10. With
> > this modification, the aclk_vio_noc should be put into critical list,
> > since it is required by VOP.
> > And the Type-C DP need these clocks: aclk_hdcp_noc, hclk_hdcp_noc,
> > pclk_hdcp_noc. Mark them as critical to avoid someone close them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 6 +++++-
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> > b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c index b173711a..676b017 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> > @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch
> > rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = {> 
> >         /* vio */
> >         COMPOSITE(ACLK_VIO, "aclk_vio", mux_pll_src_cpll_gpll_ppll_p,
> >         CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,>         
> >                         RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(42), 6, 2, MFLAGS, 0, 5, DFLAGS,
> > 
> > -                       RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(11), 10, GFLAGS),
> > +                       RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(11), 0, GFLAGS),
> > 
> >         COMPOSITE_NOMUX(PCLK_VIO, "pclk_vio", "aclk_vio", 0,
> >         
> >                         RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(43), 0, 5, DFLAGS,
> >                         RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(11), 1, GFLAGS),
> > 
> > @@ -1470,6 +1470,9 @@ static const char *const
> > rk3399_cru_critical_clocks[] __initconst = {> 
> >         "aclk_cci_pre",
> >         "aclk_gic",
> >         "aclk_gic_noc",
> > 
> > +       "aclk_hdcp_noc",
> > +       "hclk_hdcp_noc",
> > +       "pclk_hdcp_noc",
> > 
> >         "pclk_perilp0",
> >         "pclk_perilp0",
> >         "hclk_perilp0",
> > 
> > @@ -1489,6 +1492,7 @@ static const char *const
> > rk3399_cru_critical_clocks[] __initconst = {> 
> >         "gpll_hclk_perilp1_src",
> >         "gpll_aclk_perilp0_src",
> >         "gpll_aclk_perihp_src",
> > 
> > +       "aclk_vio_noc",
> 
> I think there was a previous comment suggesting that this clock should
> be handled differently. Has this been resolved ?

The clock getting handled differently was pclk_grf_vio - aka the GRF part 
needed. This one is the interconnect clock of the vio port (as far as I 
understand that), which we currently don't model at all.
But if we did it would probably handled in some new part but not in the 
graphics drivers.

So all looks well like it is here :-)

Heiko

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[v2 PATCH] clk: rockchip: mark rk3399 hdcp_noc and vio_noc as critical Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com> - 2016-08-09 20:10 +0200
  Re: [v2 PATCH] clk: rockchip: mark rk3399 hdcp_noc and vio_noc as critical Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com> - 2016-08-11 00:20 +0200
    Re: [v2 PATCH] clk: rockchip: mark rk3399 hdcp_noc and vio_noc as  critical Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> - 2016-08-11 04:50 +0200
    Re: [v2 PATCH] clk: rockchip: mark rk3399 hdcp_noc and vio_noc as critical Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-08-11 09:10 +0200
  Re: [v2 PATCH] clk: rockchip: mark rk3399 hdcp_noc and vio_noc as critical Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-08-12 00:20 +0200
    Re: [v2 PATCH] clk: rockchip: mark rk3399 hdcp_noc and vio_noc as  critical Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com> - 2016-08-12 02:40 +0200

csiph-web