Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1456269
| From | zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 2/4] bpf, security: Add Checmate |
| Date | 2016-08-04 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s2nia-73p-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s2l6F-5K2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s2lT4-6gd-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <s2mcp-6oY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Sure. Is it better to add #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU ? On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > Please do not top post > > On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:08 +0800, zhuyj wrote: >> +void register_checmate_prog_ops(void); >> maybe it is extern void register_checmate_prog_ops(void);? >> >> + preempt_disable(); >> + rcu_read_lock(); >> IMHO, it is not necessary to use the above 2 since rcu_read_lock will >> call preempt_disable. > > You might double check if this claim is true if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y > > >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC 2/4] bpf, security: Add Checmate Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> - 2016-08-04 09:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/4] bpf, security: Add Checmate zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 10:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/4] bpf, security: Add Checmate Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 10:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/4] bpf, security: Add Checmate zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 11:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/4] bpf, security: Add Checmate Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> - 2016-08-05 09:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/4] bpf, security: Add Checmate zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 09:50 +0200
csiph-web