Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1456247
| From | Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint |
| Date | 2016-08-04 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s2mYO-6W6-45@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s1Xxo-6Z4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <s21rk-1e7-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, On Wednesday 03 August 2016 03:17 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:33:19AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The PCIe controller present in TI's DRA7 SoC is capable of operating either in >> Root Complex mode or Endpoint mode. (It uses Synopsys Designware Core).I'd >> assume most of the PCIe controllers on other platforms that use Designware core >> should also be capable to operate in endpoint mode. But linux kernel right now >> supports only RC mode. >> >> PCIe endpoint support discussion came up briefly before [1] but it was felt the >> practical use case will find firmware more suitable and endpoint support in >> kernel can be used only for validation or demo. > > I disagree. It's highly useful for rapid prototyping of hardware > interfaces, and I've been looking into PCIe EP drivers for exactly > that reason recently. Going a little offtopic: any good DRA7 eval > boards you'd recommend to try for this purpose? I think the only publicly available DRA7 based board with PCIe (mPCIe slot) is AM572x EVM (http://www.ti.com/tool/TMDSEVM572X). The board comes only with a female PCIe slot. So a special cable would be required to connect it to a PCIe host. However for my development I'm planning to use dra7-evm which has standard female PCIe connector and I'll use a cable like PE-FLEX1 male-to-male (in http://www.adexelec.com/pciexp.htm) to connect back-to-back boards. > > We already have a EP driver in the tree: > > drivers/misc/spear13xx_pcie_gadget.c > > but as far as I can tell it doesn't really work at the moment. Okay. I wasn't aware of that. I'll take a look at that one. > >> Validation or demo is itself a valid use case in my opinion (consider something >> similar to gadget zero for USB). There can be other use cases as well. The RC >> can use the SoC with EP mode support as an accelerator to accomplish specific >> task. Here RC gives data to the EP. The EP processes the data. The processing >> can be done either in ARM itself or it can use other hardware accelerators >> (like DSP, IVA-HD etc..) present in the EP system. If HW accelerator is used, >> the linux kernel running in ARM can be used to accomplish other tasks. Once EP >> mode support is added, I think more use cases will be added. > > That sounds useful as well. > >> >From the high level this should look _similar_ to the gadget framework of USB. >> One difference from USB would be this should allow HW components (like DSP, PRU >> etc.. and maybe even some peripheral) in the EP system to be used by RC system. > > Indeed. > >> So these are the high-level steps that I thought would be needed to add EP >> support in linux. >> *) move pcie-designware.c out of drivers/pci/host (maybe create a >> drivers/pci/designware/ folder?). All users of pcie-designware.c should be >> moved here. >> This is in preparation for adding EP mode support to designware. > > I'd use a new drivers/pci/controller. Or maybe just skip the rename > for now and see how this evolves. Sure. That makes more sense. > > The rest of the plan sounds fine to me. cool. Thanks Kishon
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-03 08:10 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-03 10:00 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-04 10:30 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-08-03 12:20 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-03 18:20 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-08-03 20:00 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-03 21:50 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-04 11:20 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> - 2016-08-03 16:10 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-04 12:10 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-04 13:20 +0200
csiph-web