Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1455673

Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint

From Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint
Date 2016-08-03 10:00 +0200
Message-ID <s1ZfQ-89Q-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s1Xxo-6Z4-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 11:33:19 AM CEST Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The PCIe controller present in TI's DRA7 SoC is capable of operating either in
> Root Complex mode or Endpoint mode. (It uses Synopsys Designware Core).I'd
> assume most of the PCIe controllers on other platforms that use Designware core
> should also be capable to operate in endpoint mode. But linux kernel right now
> supports only RC mode.
> 
> PCIe endpoint support discussion came up briefly before [1] but it was felt the
> practical use case will find firmware more suitable and endpoint support in
> kernel can be used only for validation or demo.
> 
> Validation or demo is itself a valid use case in my opinion (consider something
> similar to gadget zero for USB). There can be other use cases as well. The RC
> can use the SoC with EP mode support as an accelerator to accomplish specific
> task. Here RC gives data to the EP. The EP processes the data. The processing
> can be done either in ARM itself or it can use other hardware accelerators
> (like DSP, IVA-HD etc..) present in the EP system. If HW accelerator is used,
> the linux kernel running in ARM can be used to accomplish other tasks. Once EP
> mode support is added, I think more use cases will be added.
> 
> From the high level this should look _similar_ to the gadget framework of USB.
> One difference from USB would be this should allow HW components (like DSP, PRU
> etc.. and maybe even some peripheral) in the EP system to be used by RC system.

(Adding Jon Mason)

We have the drivers/ntb framework, which in theory should be able to handle
this, but in practice is only used for a very small number of bridge
implementations, and is also limited in the way it can be configured
(compared to USB gadget)

> So these are the high-level steps that I thought would be needed to add EP
> support in linux.
> *) move pcie-designware.c out of drivers/pci/host (maybe create a
> drivers/pci/designware/ folder?). All users of pcie-designware.c should be
> moved here.
> This is in preparation for adding EP mode support to designware.

A lot of the other drivers in drivers/pci/host support endpoint mode too,
I don't think moving them all elsewhere is helpful or necessary here.

> *) Add library functions in pcie-designware.c specific to EP mode like
> initializing general ecam registers, BAR registers etc.. These functions should
> be invoked from a *function* driver (function driver should determine the use
> of a particular EP).
> 
> *) Add a sample *function* driver that can be used just for validation. This
> function driver will invoke the previously added functions in PCIe controller
> to initialize ecam, BAR etc.. This will invoke the PCIe controller functions
> through *ep-core* layer. That way the same function driver can be made to work
> with different PCIe controllers. (A PCIe driver corresponding to this function
> driver should also be implemented in RC side)
> 
> *) Add *ep-core* layer to bind the function driver to the controller driver and
> using which the function driver will invoke controller driver callbacks (to
> initialize ecam, BAR registers etc..)

I think we should first have a rough idea what the framework should look like,
and how it handles having multiple hardware implementation and multiple
protocol implementations, before we modify a particular driver.

So this step here should come a bit earlier than the others.

> *) Modify platform driver to support EP mode (in my case pci-dra7xx.c).
> 
> *) dt binding specific to EP mode should be created.

Right.

	Arnd

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-03 08:10 +0200
  Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-03 10:00 +0200
    Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-04 10:30 +0200
  Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-08-03 12:20 +0200
    Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-03 18:20 +0200
      Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-08-03 20:00 +0200
        Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-03 21:50 +0200
    Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-04 11:20 +0200
  Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> - 2016-08-03 16:10 +0200
    Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-04 12:10 +0200
      Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-04 13:20 +0200

csiph-web