Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1455673
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint |
| Date | 2016-08-03 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s1ZfQ-89Q-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s1Xxo-6Z4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 11:33:19 AM CEST Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > The PCIe controller present in TI's DRA7 SoC is capable of operating either in > Root Complex mode or Endpoint mode. (It uses Synopsys Designware Core).I'd > assume most of the PCIe controllers on other platforms that use Designware core > should also be capable to operate in endpoint mode. But linux kernel right now > supports only RC mode. > > PCIe endpoint support discussion came up briefly before [1] but it was felt the > practical use case will find firmware more suitable and endpoint support in > kernel can be used only for validation or demo. > > Validation or demo is itself a valid use case in my opinion (consider something > similar to gadget zero for USB). There can be other use cases as well. The RC > can use the SoC with EP mode support as an accelerator to accomplish specific > task. Here RC gives data to the EP. The EP processes the data. The processing > can be done either in ARM itself or it can use other hardware accelerators > (like DSP, IVA-HD etc..) present in the EP system. If HW accelerator is used, > the linux kernel running in ARM can be used to accomplish other tasks. Once EP > mode support is added, I think more use cases will be added. > > From the high level this should look _similar_ to the gadget framework of USB. > One difference from USB would be this should allow HW components (like DSP, PRU > etc.. and maybe even some peripheral) in the EP system to be used by RC system. (Adding Jon Mason) We have the drivers/ntb framework, which in theory should be able to handle this, but in practice is only used for a very small number of bridge implementations, and is also limited in the way it can be configured (compared to USB gadget) > So these are the high-level steps that I thought would be needed to add EP > support in linux. > *) move pcie-designware.c out of drivers/pci/host (maybe create a > drivers/pci/designware/ folder?). All users of pcie-designware.c should be > moved here. > This is in preparation for adding EP mode support to designware. A lot of the other drivers in drivers/pci/host support endpoint mode too, I don't think moving them all elsewhere is helpful or necessary here. > *) Add library functions in pcie-designware.c specific to EP mode like > initializing general ecam registers, BAR registers etc.. These functions should > be invoked from a *function* driver (function driver should determine the use > of a particular EP). > > *) Add a sample *function* driver that can be used just for validation. This > function driver will invoke the previously added functions in PCIe controller > to initialize ecam, BAR etc.. This will invoke the PCIe controller functions > through *ep-core* layer. That way the same function driver can be made to work > with different PCIe controllers. (A PCIe driver corresponding to this function > driver should also be implemented in RC side) > > *) Add *ep-core* layer to bind the function driver to the controller driver and > using which the function driver will invoke controller driver callbacks (to > initialize ecam, BAR registers etc..) I think we should first have a rough idea what the framework should look like, and how it handles having multiple hardware implementation and multiple protocol implementations, before we modify a particular driver. So this step here should come a bit earlier than the others. > *) Modify platform driver to support EP mode (in my case pci-dra7xx.c). > > *) dt binding specific to EP mode should be created. Right. Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-03 08:10 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-03 10:00 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-04 10:30 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-08-03 12:20 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-03 18:20 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-08-03 20:00 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-03 21:50 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-04 11:20 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> - 2016-08-03 16:10 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-08-04 12:10 +0200
Re: Support for configurable PCIe endpoint Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-04 13:20 +0200
csiph-web