Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: qcom_smd: Fix voltage ranges for pm8x41

From	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: qcom_smd: Fix voltage ranges for pm8x41
Date	2016-08-05 03:00 +0200
Message-ID	<s2BEu-qb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rTRp8-4gA-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTRp8-4gA-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTSbw-4P8-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 07/11, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:50:07PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> 
> >  static const struct regulator_desc pm8941_pldo = {
> >  	.linear_ranges = (struct regulator_linear_range[]) {
> > -		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE( 750000,  0,  30, 25000),
> > -		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1500000, 31, 99, 50000),
> > +		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE( 750000,  0,  63, 12500),
> > +		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1550000, 64, 126, 25000),
> > +		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(3100000, 127, 163, 50000),
> >  	},
> > -	.n_linear_ranges = 2,
> > -	.n_voltages = 100,
> > +	.n_linear_ranges = 3,
> > +	.n_voltages = 164,
> >  	.ops = &rpm_smps_ldo_ops,
> >  };
> 
> Still a little confused on if the 12.5mV is allowed on pmos ldo.  It seems like the
> nmos has 1 range of 5mV steps.  The PMOS has 2 ranges, using 25mV and 50mV
> 

The values I've put in these patches are the correct ranges.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: qcom_smd: Fix voltage ranges for pm8x41 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-05 03:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: qcom_smd: Fix voltage ranges for pm8x41 Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> - 2016-08-05 06:10 +0200

csiph-web