Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1454998
| From | Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0867/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro |
| Date | 2016-08-02 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s1L3c-725-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s1H9i-4r7-83@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 19:53 +0800, Baole Ni wrote: > I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value > when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access > permission. > As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the > corresponding macro, > and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of > the code, > thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. > > Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> > --- > > static int timeout = 5000; /* in msec ( 5 sec ) */ > -module_param(timeout, int, 0644); > +module_param(timeout, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); To me, 644 is more 'readable', and as for robustness, the meaning of 644 will never change. -Geoff
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0867/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 14:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH 0867/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org> - 2016-08-02 18:50 +0200
csiph-web