Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1452685

Re: [PATCH RESEND nf] netfilter: avoid a race between nf_register_hook() and cleanup_net()

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH RESEND nf] netfilter: avoid a race between nf_register_hook() and cleanup_net()
Date Sat, 30 Jul 2016 15:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <s0CEF-38l-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s0iFY-6Z7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s0iFY-6Z7-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
X-Xm-Spf eid=1bTUSS-0005Nz-OR;;;mid=<87shurb6ne.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.3.204.119;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral
X-Xm-Aid U2FsdGVkX18xKBd9H0n3ifLmsEQjS8J7h2G0+i58JVM=
X-Sa-Exim-Connect-IP 67.3.204.119
X-Sa-Exim-Mail-From ebiederm@xmission.com
X-Spam-Report * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject
X-Spam-Dcc XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Spam-Combo ;Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
X-Spam-Timing total 549 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.6 (0.8%), b_tie_ro: 3.3 (0.6%), parse: 1.12 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 20 (3.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 3.5 (0.6%), tests_pri_-1000: 7 (1.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.23 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.03 (0.2%), tests_pri_-400: 27 (4.9%), check_bayes: 26 (4.7%), b_tokenize: 8 (1.4%), b_tok_get_all: 9 (1.6%), b_comp_prob: 3.2 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.6 (0.7%), b_finish: 0.92 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 479 (87.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.52 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 22 (3.9%), tests_pri_500: 4.7 (0.9%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%)
X-Spam-Flag No
X-Sa-Exim-Version 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600)
X-Sa-Exim-Scanned Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com)
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 98
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
X-Original-Date Sat, 30 Jul 2016 08:24:37 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID <87shurb6ne.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
X-Original-References <20160729150033.E0250A0BD9@unicorn.suse.cz> <20160729161904.4F00BA0BD9@unicorn.suse.cz>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref csiph.com linux.kernel:1452685

Show key headers only | View raw


Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> writes:

> There is a race condition between nf_{,un}register_hook() and
> cleanup_net() which can either trigger WARN check or cause a memory
> leak. The scenario is like this (2a and 2b are alternatives):
>
> 1.  cleanup_net() removes one or more struct net from net_namespace_list
> 2a. nf_register_hook() adds per-netns hooks to all netns (but not those
>     removed in step 1) and adds the hook to global nf_hook_list
> 2b. nf_unregister_hook() deletes per-netns hooks from all netns (but not
>     those removed in step 1) and removes the hook from nf_hook_list
> 3.  cleanup_net() calls pernet subsystem exit functions for netns being
>     removed; one of them is netfilter_net_exit() which (among others)
>     calls nf_unregister_net_hook() to unregister per-netns hooks for all
>     hooks in nf_hook_list.
>
> In case (a), per-netns hooks are never added as the namespace was
> already invisible to for_each_net() in step 2a but an attempt to remove
> them in step 3 (the hook is already in nf_hook_list) triggers a WARN
> check in nf_unregister_net_hook() (no real harm done, however). In case
> (b), the per-netns hook is removed neither in step 2b (netns is already
> invisible to for_each_net()) nor in step 3 (the hook is already removed
> from nf_hook_list), causing a memory leak.
>
> Prevent the race by protecting the for_each_net() loop in
> nf_{,un}register_hook() (also) by net_mutex. There is already a
> precendens for this in rtnl_link_unregister() which addresses similar
> race.

So this analysis of a problem appears to be spot on.

Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>


I really really want there to be a better way to do this, but it is
really not ok for a hook to continue it's life past
nf_unregister_net_hook as after that point the code may be removed
from the kernel (sigh).

Although keeping with the precedent and minimizing net_mutex
we could remove the WARN and keep nf_register_hook as it is.
But that sounds entirely too clever for a fix that will
probably be backported.

But that sounds entirely too clever for a fix that likely needs to be
backported.

Eric

> Fixes: 085db2c04557 ("netfilter: Per network namespace netfilter hooks.")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/core.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
> index f39276d1c2d7..860978c9f82e 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
>  	struct net *net, *last;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	/* prevent race with cleanup_net() */
> +	mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
>  	rtnl_lock();
>  	for_each_net(net) {
>  		ret = nf_register_net_hook(net, reg);
> @@ -201,6 +203,7 @@ int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
>  	}
>  	list_add_tail(&reg->list, &nf_hook_list);
>  	rtnl_unlock();
> +	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  rollback:
> @@ -211,6 +214,7 @@ rollback:
>  		nf_unregister_net_hook(net, reg);
>  	}
>  	rtnl_unlock();
> +	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_register_hook);
> @@ -219,11 +223,14 @@ void nf_unregister_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
>  {
>  	struct net *net;
>  
> +	/* prevent race with cleanup_net() */
> +	mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
>  	rtnl_lock();
>  	list_del(&reg->list);
>  	for_each_net(net)
>  		nf_unregister_net_hook(net, reg);
>  	rtnl_unlock();
> +	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_unregister_hook);

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH RESEND nf] netfilter: avoid a race between nf_register_hook()  and cleanup_net() Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> - 2016-07-29 18:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH RESEND nf] netfilter: avoid a race between nf_register_hook() and cleanup_net() ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-30 15:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RESEND nf] netfilter: avoid a race between  nf_register_hook() and cleanup_net() Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> - 2016-08-01 14:50 +0200

csiph-web